From: Paul Furness <paul.furness@vil.ite.mee.com>
To: linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RedHat 8
Date: 23 Oct 2002 13:56:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035377769.1920.60.camel@zebra.vil.ite.mee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002e01c27a90$5f956220$64fea8c0@pkrausxp>
> What does everyone think of RedHat 8.
>
I have negative feelings about it.
I nuked my workstation and installed RH8.0 from scratch. The
installation was a lot nicer than previous versions, but once it had
installed I found that, for me at least, there was a lot missing. The
window manager had changed again (I'm not entirely sure why). Lots of
apps seemed to be missing, and the impression I got was that a lot of
multimedia stuff particularly had been removed from the default set up.
I did a custom install and still found it lacking a lot of nice
multi-media stuff.
On the flip side, Gnome 2 is nice, and definitely performs better on my
workstation that 1.4. OpenOffice.org 1.0.1 ships with it as well, which
is nice, and the icons look lovely.
I struggled against RH8 for about 3 days before giving up, wiping my
hard disk, and putting 7.3 back on here. That's not to say that RH8 is
no good, and it could be that I was just expecting it to behave in a
different way. I had only minor gripes, really, but in my job of
supporting everyone else in the company, I couldn't really afford to be
messing around with my workstation for hours.
If you aren't particularly used to previous versions of Red Hat as a
desktop O/S, you'll probably not find much fault with Red Hat 8.
Personally, I felt (possibly incorrectly) that the customisations which
I likes were not available, so I stopped using it.
I fully intend to build a second machine (or probably a VMWare virtual
machine) using 8 to give it a proper, fair hearing.
Of course, other people may agree with me, so I might not be completely
wrong... :)
Paul.
--
Paul Furness
Systems Manager
2+2=5 for extremely large values of 2.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-23 12:33 RedHat 8 Paul Kraus
2002-10-23 12:49 ` Ken Boyer
2002-10-23 12:56 ` Paul Kraus
2002-10-24 0:53 ` Jude DaShiell
2002-10-23 13:32 ` Don Petrowski
2002-10-23 12:56 ` Paul Furness [this message]
2002-10-23 13:03 ` Paul Kraus
2002-10-23 13:44 ` Paul Furness
2002-10-23 13:33 ` Haines Brown
2002-10-23 20:30 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-23 20:57 ` Haines Brown
2002-10-24 11:39 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-24 13:25 ` Bryan Simmons
2002-10-24 13:58 ` Paul Furness
2002-10-24 18:01 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-24 16:36 ` Paulo Jorge
2002-10-23 13:48 ` Don Petrowski
2002-10-23 15:39 ` Carl
2002-10-23 20:24 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-23 20:31 ` Paul Kraus
2002-10-24 11:33 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-24 13:13 ` Paul Furness
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1035377769.1920.60.camel@zebra.vil.ite.mee.com \
--to=paul.furness@vil.ite.mee.com \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox