public inbox for linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* reiserfs
@ 2004-01-25  8:40 S. Barret Dolph
  2004-01-25 11:44 ` reiserfs Axel Siebenwirth
  2004-01-25 12:17 ` reiserfs Axel Siebenwirth
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: S. Barret Dolph @ 2004-01-25  8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-newbie

I have looked at the various file system stuff for comparison. I have been 
using Reiserfs for some time now and had, until recently, no problems. 

?s

Are Xfs and Jfs still too new to use?

I have used ext3 for my / partition. But I can't remember who told me I should 
do that or why. Is it a good idea or is Reiserfs fine. 

(Other partitions are /swap, /usr, and /home. swap as swap, and the others are 
reiserfs.) 



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: reiserfs
  2004-01-25  8:40 reiserfs S. Barret Dolph
@ 2004-01-25 11:44 ` Axel Siebenwirth
  2004-01-26  0:14   ` reiserfs Ken Moffat
  2004-01-25 12:17 ` reiserfs Axel Siebenwirth
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Axel Siebenwirth @ 2004-01-25 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: S. Barret Dolph; +Cc: linux-newbie

Hi S.!

On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, S. Barret Dolph wrote:

> I have looked at the various file system stuff for comparison. I have been 
> using Reiserfs for some time now and had, until recently, no problems. 

What problems exactly?

> Are Xfs and Jfs still too new to use?

No, they are quite mature filesystems and finally well integrated into the
linux kernel.

> 
> I have used ext3 for my / partition. But I can't remember who told me I should 
> do that or why. Is it a good idea or is Reiserfs fine.

Ext3 is slower as far as I know. Reiserfs is quite stable.
I've had the feeling that JFS was faster when it comes to accessing larger
files and reading large directories, I mean with many files.
I have never actually tried ext3 but have read that it has many problems as
well and is quite slow. The On-disk-layout is very old already.


Axel

> 
> (Other partitions are /swap, /usr, and /home. swap as swap, and the others are 
> reiserfs.) 


____________________________________________________________________________
Axel Siebenwirth				      phone +49 3641 776807 |
Am Birnstiel 3			 		  axel at pearbough dot net |
07745 Jena								    |
Germany________________________________________________http://pearbough.net |

Peeping Tom:
        A window fan.
____________________________________________________________________________
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: reiserfs
  2004-01-25  8:40 reiserfs S. Barret Dolph
  2004-01-25 11:44 ` reiserfs Axel Siebenwirth
@ 2004-01-25 12:17 ` Axel Siebenwirth
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Axel Siebenwirth @ 2004-01-25 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: S. Barret Dolph; +Cc: linux-newbie

Hi S.!

On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, S. Barret Dolph wrote:

> I have looked at the various file system stuff for comparison. I have been 
> using Reiserfs for some time now and had, until recently, no problems. 
> 
> ?s
> 
> Are Xfs and Jfs still too new to use?
> 
> I have used ext3 for my / partition. But I can't remember who told me I should 
> do that or why. Is it a good idea or is Reiserfs fine. 

An old article at freshmeat.net:
http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/212/
But still applies.

Axel


____________________________________________________________________________
Axel Siebenwirth				      phone +49 3641 776807 |
Am Birnstiel 3			 		  axel at pearbough dot net |
07745 Jena								    |
Germany________________________________________________http://pearbough.net |

Recent research has tended to show that the Abominable No-Man
is being replaced by the Prohibitive Procrastinator.
                -- C.N. Parkinson
____________________________________________________________________________
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: reiserfs
  2004-01-25 11:44 ` reiserfs Axel Siebenwirth
@ 2004-01-26  0:14   ` Ken Moffat
  2004-01-26  0:28     ` reiserfs Ken Moffat
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ken Moffat @ 2004-01-26  0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Axel Siebenwirth; +Cc: S. Barret Dolph, linux-newbie

On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Axel Siebenwirth wrote:

>
> Ext3 is slower as far as I know. Reiserfs is quite stable.
> I've had the feeling that JFS was faster when it comes to accessing larger
> files and reading large directories, I mean with many files.
> I have never actually tried ext3 but have read that it has many problems as
> well and is quite slow. The On-disk-layout is very old already.
>

Ooh, almost FUD!  I remember reading a sound-recording HOWTO suggesting
ext2 was slow, but I use it on all my machines, I've had no problems
with it, and I've seen no speed problems attributable to the filesystem

:)

Ken
-- 
This is a job for Riviera Kid!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: reiserfs
  2004-01-26  0:14   ` reiserfs Ken Moffat
@ 2004-01-26  0:28     ` Ken Moffat
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ken Moffat @ 2004-01-26  0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Axel Siebenwirth; +Cc: S. Barret Dolph, linux-newbie

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Ken Moffat wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Axel Siebenwirth wrote:
>
> >
> > Ext3 is slower as far as I know. Reiserfs is quite stable.
> > I've had the feeling that JFS was faster when it comes to accessing larger
> > files and reading large directories, I mean with many files.
> > I have never actually tried ext3 but have read that it has many problems as
> > well and is quite slow. The On-disk-layout is very old already.
> >
>
> Ooh, almost FUD!  I remember reading a sound-recording HOWTO suggesting
> ext2 was slow, but I use it on all my machines, I've had no problems
> with it, and I've seen no speed problems attributable to the filesystem
>
> :)
>
> Ken
>

s/ext2/ext3/ # learn to proofread before hitting enter
-- 
This is a job for Riviera Kid!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-26  0:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-25  8:40 reiserfs S. Barret Dolph
2004-01-25 11:44 ` reiserfs Axel Siebenwirth
2004-01-26  0:14   ` reiserfs Ken Moffat
2004-01-26  0:28     ` reiserfs Ken Moffat
2004-01-25 12:17 ` reiserfs Axel Siebenwirth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox