* Proc structure standards.
@ 2004-11-27 7:59 Manish Regmi
2004-11-30 0:45 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Manish Regmi @ 2004-11-27 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies; +Cc: linux-newbie
Hi all,
Is there any standard to the proc interface?
Or Linux, Solaris, HPUX etc, etc... do their own way or follow some standards.
Thanks in advance.
--
Manish Regmi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Proc structure standards.
2004-11-27 7:59 Proc structure standards Manish Regmi
@ 2004-11-30 0:45 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2004-11-30 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manish Regmi; +Cc: kernelnewbies, linux-newbie
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:44:26PM +0545, Manish Regmi wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is there any standard to the proc interface?
Only standard is don't add any more new proc files :)
Use sysfs instead.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-30 0:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-27 7:59 Proc structure standards Manish Regmi
2004-11-30 0:45 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox