From: Chuck Gelm <nc8q@gelm.net>
To: Linux Newbie <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: firewall blocks ppp0?
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 12:02:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DE10641.5A70C2DF@gelm.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1978 bytes --]
How/why did your message arrive as
From: Haines Brown <brownh@hartford-hwp.com> Sat 6:55 PM
Subject: firewall blocks ppp0?
To: linux-newbie@hartford-hwp.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
???????????????
This does not allow a 'reply all' :-(
Dear Haines Brown:
I use Roaring Penguin PPPOE. http://www.roaringpenguin.com/pppoe/
I selected permanent connection, but I am unsure if this applies
to eth# or ppp#. :-| 'adsl-setup' and 'adsl-start' are script
names with my application (Roaring Penguin). I am assuming that
your using the same or similar.
How do you know "I definitely have eth0 set to be permanently
up" ? Actually, I'm betting that it is ppp# that is set to
demand or permanent.
It seems that your dsl connection (PPPOE?) application is
setting up IPCHAINS, but your kernel is using IPTABLES.
You can:
- reconfigure (make config) your kernel to use IPCHAINS.
- configure IPTABLES to replace your dsl-connection application's
attempt to use IPCHAINS.
HTH, Chuck
Haines Brown wrote:
>
> I'm setting up a copy of RedHat 8.0 on a machine that is intended as a
> standalone machine with DSL access to Internet.
>
> I have eth0 up and running, and did the adsl-setup with my usual valid
> information. The problem comes trying to make ppp0 active. It tries,
> but cycles between active and inactive.
>
> When I run adsl-start with debugging, it tells me that I'm set up for
> demand-connection. I definitely have eth0 set to be permanently
> up. Does this alert refer instead to ppp0? If so, perhaps this is what
> I'd expect. Is that right?
>
> I'm also told: ipchains: Protocol not available
>
> That sounds to me as if my firewall (which I set to be "high"
> protection), may be blocking the ppp protocol. Does this seem to be
> the case?
>
> I went to pursue this, and ran ipchains -L, but got the error message
> that this command is incompabible with my kernel.
>
> What to do?
>
> Haines Brown
[-- Attachment #2: nsmail8M.TMP --]
[-- Type: message/delivery-status, Size: 384 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: nsmailIN.TMP --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2641 bytes --]
From: Chuck Gelm <nc8q@gelm.net>
To: Haines Brown <brownh@hartford-hwp.com>
Cc: linux-newbie@hartford-hwp.com
Subject: Re: firewall blocks ppp0?
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:48:58 -0500
Message-ID: <3DE102FA.85D8F85D@gelm.net>
Dear Haines Brown:
I use Roaring Penguin PPPOE. http://www.roaringpenguin.com/pppoe/
I selected permanent connection, but I am unsure if this applies
to eth# or ppp#. :-| 'adsl-setup' and 'adsl-start' are script
names with my application (Roaring Penguin). I am assuming that
your using the same or similar.
How do you know "I definitely have eth0 set to be permanently
up" ? Actually, I'm betting that it is ppp# that is set to
demand or permanent.
It seems that your dsl connection (PPPOE?) application is
setting up IPCHAINS, but your kernel is using IPTABLES.
You can:
- reconfigure (make config) your kernel to use IPCHAINS.
- configure IPTABLES to replace your dsl-connection application's
attempt to use IPCHAINS.
HTH, Chuck
Haines Brown wrote:
>
> I'm setting up a copy of RedHat 8.0 on a machine that is intended as a
> standalone machine with DSL access to Internet.
>
> I have eth0 up and running, and did the adsl-setup with my usual valid
> information. The problem comes trying to make ppp0 active. It tries,
> but cycles between active and inactive.
>
> When I run adsl-start with debugging, it tells me that I'm set up for
> demand-connection. I definitely have eth0 set to be permanently
> up. Does this alert refer instead to ppp0? If so, perhaps this is what
> I'd expect. Is that right?
>
> I'm also told: ipchains: Protocol not available
>
> That sounds to me as if my firewall (which I set to be "high"
> protection), may be blocking the ppp protocol. Does this seem to be
> the case?
>
> I went to pursue this, and ran ipchains -L, but got the error message
> that this command is incompabible with my kernel.
>
> What to do?
>
> Haines Brown
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-24 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-24 17:02 Chuck Gelm [this message]
2002-11-24 18:14 ` firewall blocks ppp0? Haines Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-23 23:55 Haines Brown
[not found] ` <3DE102FA.85D8F85D@gelm.net>
2002-11-24 18:01 ` Haines Brown
2002-11-24 18:58 ` Ray Olszewski
2002-11-25 20:57 ` Haines Brown
2002-11-25 22:44 ` Ray Olszewski
2002-11-26 0:30 ` Chuck Gelm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DE10641.5A70C2DF@gelm.net \
--to=nc8q@gelm.net \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox