public inbox for linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Cfdisk VS Fdisk??
@ 2005-03-13 13:15 Hal MacArgle
  2005-03-13 17:54 ` Ray Olszewski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hal MacArgle @ 2005-03-13 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-newbie


Greetings: Using both Fdisk and Cfdisk for years I've never run into
the latest "discovery," and was wondering if anyone else has
experienced it..

Various MotherBoards and, mostly, Slackware distribs, I've
standardised on Slack 9.0 or 9.1, kernel 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 on all
machines..

Evaluating a Tyan S1564S MB with Intel 430HX chipsets; Cfdisk and
Fdisk report radical differences depending on which of four HD's I've
tried.. Two WD Caviar 2340's, 340mB, were manipulated by Cfdisk OK
but Fdisk reported _no_ partitions at all.. (In the past I've noted
differences in byte amounts, etc, but never this.) <grin>

At first I thought it was because of the older drives so I fitted a
Maxtor 20gB drive and got the same report.. Fitting a Seagate, 8gB,
fdisk reported correctly with it.. (In all cases a single drive
attached to Primary IDE as Master.)

Reading man fdisk, it surprised me to see the author saying to not
use fdisk because Cfdisk was better and sfdisk should be used if it's
features needed... "Too many bugs," he or she wrote...

Is this something to be concerned about? Or just one of the many
anomolies we've learned to live with thru the years?? TIA..
-- 

    Hal - in Terra Alta, WV - Slackware GNU/Linux 9.0   (2.4.20-1)
.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Cfdisk VS Fdisk??
  2005-03-13 13:15 Cfdisk VS Fdisk?? Hal MacArgle
@ 2005-03-13 17:54 ` Ray Olszewski
  2005-03-13 22:05   ` chuck gelm
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ray Olszewski @ 2005-03-13 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-newbie

At 08:15 AM 3/13/2005 -0500, Hal MacArgle wrote:

>Greetings: Using both Fdisk and Cfdisk for years I've never run into
>the latest "discovery," and was wondering if anyone else has
>experienced it..
>
>Various MotherBoards and, mostly, Slackware distribs, I've
>standardised on Slack 9.0 or 9.1, kernel 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 on all
>machines..
>
>Evaluating a Tyan S1564S MB with Intel 430HX chipsets; Cfdisk and
>Fdisk report radical differences depending on which of four HD's I've
>tried.. Two WD Caviar 2340's, 340mB, were manipulated by Cfdisk OK
>but Fdisk reported _no_ partitions at all.. (In the past I've noted
>differences in byte amounts, etc, but never this.) <grin>
>
>At first I thought it was because of the older drives so I fitted a
>Maxtor 20gB drive and got the same report.. Fitting a Seagate, 8gB,
>fdisk reported correctly with it.. (In all cases a single drive
>attached to Primary IDE as Master.)
>
>Reading man fdisk, it surprised me to see the author saying to not
>use fdisk because Cfdisk was better and sfdisk should be used if it's
>features needed... "Too many bugs," he or she wrote...
>
>Is this something to be concerned about? Or just one of the many
>anomolies we've learned to live with thru the years?? TIA..


I've seen similar behavior in the past, and it proved to be a versioning 
issue ... I was using an up-to-date cfdisk (on the Debian installer disk) 
and an old fdisk (from I can't guess where ... probably a neglected Debian 
install).

I recall seeing it around the time drives hit the 150 GB range, and then 
moving to the latest fdisk dealt with it. At this point, I don't recall if 
the issue was actually drive size, or if it was CFS remapping of some sort 
associated with the mobo chipset.

I don't know what version of fdisk Slackware is shipping. MY Debian-Sid system
is perhaps six months out of date, and it has fdisk version 2.12 ("fdisk 
-v") and cfdisk and cfdisk 2.12 (cfdisk -v"). With these versions, I've 
seen no problems with drives up to 250 GB or so.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Cfdisk VS Fdisk??
  2005-03-13 17:54 ` Ray Olszewski
@ 2005-03-13 22:05   ` chuck gelm
  2005-03-15 15:21     ` Hal MacArgle
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: chuck gelm @ 2005-03-13 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hal MacArgle; +Cc: linux-newbie

Ray Olszewski wrote:
<snip>
> I don't know what version of fdisk Slackware is shipping. MY Debian-Sid 
> system
> is perhaps six months out of date, and it has fdisk version 2.12 ("fdisk 
> -v") and cfdisk and cfdisk 2.12 (cfdisk -v"). With these versions, I've 
> seen no problems with drives up to 250 GB or so.

My Slackware v9.1, kernel 2.4.22, has
fdisk v2.12 &
cfdisk v 2.12
;-)

HTH, Chuck

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Cfdisk VS Fdisk??
  2005-03-13 22:05   ` chuck gelm
@ 2005-03-15 15:21     ` Hal MacArgle
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hal MacArgle @ 2005-03-15 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-newbie

Greetings Ray and Chuck; thanks for your input.. I'm using v 2.12 of
both Fdisk and CFdisk, neither of which was the problem so the
subject line was, actually, in error..

Apprently I had three malfunctions at a time, masking the true
problem: One bad HD, a flaky flat HD cable and me... Doing all this
on a newly received MB didn't help.. Changing more than one
parameter at a time not a good idea sometime..

The HD is in the eCycle carton getting ready for Earth Day and the
cable, either evaluated critically or in the copper recycle bin..

All of the above coupled with me, somehow, losing the CMOS set up and
having to restore defaults and go from there - didn't help... Messing
with older, circa '92, drives didn't help either.. <grin>

Back to the drawing board, later, with a newer drive, etc...

Appreciate!!. Enjoying the list that supplies much of my learning
curve..


On 03-13, chuck gelm wrote:
> Ray Olszewski wrote:
> <snip>
> >I don't know what version of fdisk Slackware is shipping. MY Debian-Sid 
> >system
> >is perhaps six months out of date, and it has fdisk version 2.12 ("fdisk 
> >-v") and cfdisk and cfdisk 2.12 (cfdisk -v"). With these versions, I've 
> >seen no problems with drives up to 250 GB or so.
> 
> My Slackware v9.1, kernel 2.4.22, has
> fdisk v2.12 &
> cfdisk v 2.12
> ;-)
> 
> HTH, Chuck
> 

-- 

    Hal - in Terra Alta, WV - Slackware GNU/Linux 9.0   (2.4.20-1)
.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-15 15:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-13 13:15 Cfdisk VS Fdisk?? Hal MacArgle
2005-03-13 17:54 ` Ray Olszewski
2005-03-13 22:05   ` chuck gelm
2005-03-15 15:21     ` Hal MacArgle

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox