From: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
To: Learning Linux <learninglinux4@gmail.com>
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why can't we sleep in an ISR?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:25:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4648552D.3060808@aitel.hist.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f1dc2cf0705132337k13aa3ccesc575d4550492a24e@mail.gmail.com>
Learning Linux wrote:
> I have a very basic doubt here ... what makes it impossible to sleep
> in an ISR? I mean, I know that the kernel preemption is disabled and
> the kernel will panic, but I could not understand why?
First: an ISR is meant to be very quick. It is supposed to do only a
minimum of work needed to service the interrupt, then exit.
This is important, as other interrupts might be blocked during your ISR.
Sleeping is out of question, even a long-running loop in no-no.
Second: You don't ever need to sleep in an ISR anyway.
Complicated work that might take time or might need to sleep
is not supposed to be in an ISR. If you think you have a need,
tell us what you're up to and hopefully someone will explain
how do do things properly.
When an interrupt happens that needs complicated servicing, the
ISR don't do the whole job. It just acknowledges the interrupt,
perhaps does a few things with the device in question, then it
exits. It leaves the rest of the work for a bottom half or kernel
thread or something like that. Kernel threads may sleep . . .
Helge Hafting
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-14 6:37 Why can't we sleep in an ISR? Learning Linux
2007-05-14 7:10 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-14 7:16 ` Learning Linux
2007-05-14 15:24 ` Bahadir Balban
2007-05-14 15:56 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-15 5:17 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-15 6:45 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-15 7:10 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-15 7:28 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-15 8:12 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-15 8:40 ` Learning Linux
2007-05-15 8:58 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-15 16:57 ` Phillip Susi
2007-05-15 22:49 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-16 15:20 ` Phillip Susi
2007-05-16 23:17 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-17 16:07 ` Phillip Susi
2007-05-17 23:50 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-14 12:25 ` Helge Hafting [this message]
2007-05-14 12:52 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-14 13:36 ` Dong Feng
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-14 15:22 linux
2007-05-14 15:55 ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-15 9:34 rohit hooda
2007-05-15 9:46 ` pradeep singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4648552D.3060808@aitel.hist.no \
--to=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
--cc=learninglinux4@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox