From: "Dong Feng" <middle.fengdong@gmail.com>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
Cc: pradeep singh <2500.pradeep@gmail.com>,
Bahadir Balban <bahadir.balban@gmail.com>,
Learning Linux <learninglinux4@gmail.com>,
kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why can't we sleep in an ISR?
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:17:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2ebde260705161617u260bcb55i8c4a56e4a4875954@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464B2155.8040005@cfl.rr.com>
OK. I think the gap between you and me is the definition of term
*context*. If you go to Linux Kernel Development, 2nd Edition (ISBN
0-672-32720-1), Page 6, then you will read the following:
.... in Linux, ... each processor is doing one of three things at any
given moment:
1. In kernel-space, in process context, ...
2. In kernel-space, in interrupt context, not associated with a process, ...
3. In user-space ...
This list is inclusive. ...
Maybe you prefer other terminology system, but I do like the above
definition given by Robert Love. So maybe in your system *context*
mean something at hardware level and you say ISR is in process
context, but I think it is more like a logical level and agree with
Rovert's definition.
And in hardware level, Robert's *context* definition also mean
something specific, that I started to be aware of. That is, *in the
same context* means a kernel-code is triggered by a user-space code.
*in different context* means a kernel-code is triggered by an external
interrupt source other than a user-space code.
Context has nothing to do with whether an ISR borrow any data
structure of a process, instead, its something logical or related to
causality.
2007/5/16, Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>:
> Dong Feng wrote:
> > If what you say were true, then an ISR would be running in the same
> > context as the interrupted process.
>
> Yes, and it is, as others have said in this thread, which is a good
> reason why ISRs can't sleep.
>
> > But please check any article or
> > book, it will say ISR running in different context from any process.
> > So ISR is considered in its own context, although it shares a lot of
> > things with the interrupted process. I would only say *context* is a
> > higher-level logical concept.
>
> Depends on which book or article you are reading I suppose. The
> generally accepted and often used thought is that ISRs technically are
> running in the context of the interrupted process, but because that
> context is unknown and therefore should not be used, it is often said
> that they run in no context, or outside of any context. Sometimes
> people then assume that because they run outside of any ( particular )
> process context, they must be in their own context, but this is a mistake.
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-16 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-14 6:37 Why can't we sleep in an ISR? Learning Linux
2007-05-14 7:10 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-14 7:16 ` Learning Linux
2007-05-14 15:24 ` Bahadir Balban
2007-05-14 15:56 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-15 5:17 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-15 6:45 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-15 7:10 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-15 7:28 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-15 8:12 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-15 8:40 ` Learning Linux
2007-05-15 8:58 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-15 16:57 ` Phillip Susi
2007-05-15 22:49 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-16 15:20 ` Phillip Susi
2007-05-16 23:17 ` Dong Feng [this message]
2007-05-17 16:07 ` Phillip Susi
2007-05-17 23:50 ` Dong Feng
2007-05-14 12:25 ` Helge Hafting
2007-05-14 12:52 ` pradeep singh
2007-05-14 13:36 ` Dong Feng
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-14 15:22 linux
2007-05-14 15:55 ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-15 9:34 rohit hooda
2007-05-15 9:46 ` pradeep singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2ebde260705161617u260bcb55i8c4a56e4a4875954@mail.gmail.com \
--to=middle.fengdong@gmail.com \
--cc=2500.pradeep@gmail.com \
--cc=bahadir.balban@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
--cc=learninglinux4@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox