DVI to RTF

DVI to RTF

[G Anna]

Dear All,

Is it possible to convert from the DVI format to RTF format?  Or PDF
to RTF? Or PS to RTF?  Or DSC to RTF?

Basically I have the LaTeX source file and would like to have the
document in RTF format too.  Is this possible?  BTW, I can view the
RTF format using AbiWord.  Is there any other RTF viewer?

Thank you for your time.

Cheers,
anna


-- 

Get your free e-mail account at http://www.linuxmail.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

Re: DVI to RTF

[Michael Scottaline]

On 26 Apr 2002 00:29:27 +0530
G Anna <drguruolai@eth.net> scribbled intuitively:

>Dear All,
>
>Is it possible to convert from the DVI format to RTF format?  Or PDF
>to RTF? Or PS to RTF?  Or DSC to RTF?
>
>Basically I have the LaTeX source file and would like to have the
>document in RTF format too.  Is this possible?  BTW, I can view the
>RTF format using AbiWord.  Is there any other RTF viewer?
=================================
StarOffice, OpenOffice, Applixware, all have wordprocessors that should
handle rtf well.  WordPerfect 8.0 will as well.

Mike


-- 
"He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let that
fool you....., he really is an idiot."

-Groucho Marx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

Re: DVI to RTF

[Haines Brown]

Mike,

> >Is it possible to convert from the DVI format to RTF format?  Or PDF
> >to RTF? Or PS to RTF?  Or DSC to RTF?
> >
> >Basically I have the LaTeX source file and would like to have the
> >document in RTF format too.  Is this possible?  BTW, I can view the
> >RTF format using AbiWord.  Is there any other RTF viewer?
> =================================
> StarOffice, OpenOffice, Applixware, all have wordprocessors that should
> handle rtf well.  WordPerfect 8.0 will as well.

Well, yes, you may be correct, but the original question remains
valid. A double conversion greatly increases the problems, and so a
direct conversion from LaTeX to RTF would be better. 

Although I lack experience with it, there is a tex2rtf utility, which
converts to rtf, HTML, etc. Here's the home page:
www.anthemion.co.uk/tex2rtf/contents.htm You can get the source to
compile it yourself for unix, or you can get binaries for Linux, HP,
Windows, etc. 

Haines Brown


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

Phantom executables

[Haines Brown]

I installed RedHat 7.2 on new hardware, and have been haunted by a
frequent problem. When I try to run certain binary exectables, I get:

[brownh@langhans tex2rtf]$ ./163nogui
bash: ./163nogui: No such file or directory

However, 

[brownh@langhans tex2rtf]$ ls -l 16*
-rwxrwxrwx    1 brownh   brownh     196812 Mar 26 16:20 163nogui

and, for an executable script test file in the same directory:

[brownh@langhans tex2rtf]$ ./test-executable
I am executing this file

Is this a sign that I need to include an older libc library? 

Haines Brown 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

Re: Phantom executables

[Steven Smith]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 933 bytes --]

> [brownh@langhans tex2rtf]$ ./163nogui
> bash: ./163nogui: No such file or directory
> [brownh@langhans tex2rtf]$ ls -l 16*
> -rwxrwxrwx    1 brownh   brownh     196812 Mar 26 16:20 163nogui
> 
> and, for an executable script test file in the same directory:
> 
> [brownh@langhans tex2rtf]$ ./test-executable
> I am executing this file
> 
> Is this a sign that I need to include an older libc library? 
Usually. The most common cause of this is a funny dynamic linker.
Try going:

readelf -l ./153nogui

and look for a line something like

[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld.so.1]

If you don't have the interpreter in the right place, you'll get
No such file or directory errors. The easiest way is then probably
to recompile the broken program, or failing that use an old libc.

If you do have the interpreter, or readelf can't find it, I'd be
somewhat confused.

Steven Smith,
sos22@cam.ac.uk.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

Re: Phantom executables

[Haines Brown]

Steven,

You suggested that my executable that only returns the error, "File
not found" is probably the result of a broken or misplaced
intepreter. When I run (163nogui being the troublesone executable):

	    [root@langhans tex2rtf]# ldd ./163nogui
	    /usr/bin/ldd: ./163nogui: No such file or directory

This means it can't find a library, and so the first question is the
interpreter. I do have /lib/ld-linux.so.2, which is a symlink to
ld-linux.2.2.4.so.

Apparently I was previously also using an old interpreter that was
located on my old hardware, so I copied over
ld-linux.so.1->ld-linux.1.9.5. Now, instead of the error message, ldd
tells me what I need, and this led mt to create a symlink from
libm.so.5 to my new libm-2.2.2.so, after which I get:

  [root@langhans tex2rtf]# ldd ./163nogui
	libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x40023000)
	libstdc++.so.27 => not found
	libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x40046000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40184000)
	ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x402c2000)
	...


It looks like I'll have get the old libstdc++.so.27 and I should be in
business. I see that in rpmfind there's a libc-5.4.46-2 RPM for i386
that provides libstdc++.so.27. I've downloaded but not yet installed
it.

It looks like I should simply install this old libc-5, and it will
provide the libstdc++.27 that I need. However, I hope this
installation of old libraries won't upset my system.  

I mention all this in the hope will confirm I'm on the right track and
that I should not suffer ill effects from installing the RPM.

Haines Brown

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

Re: Phantom executables

[Steven Smith]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2032 bytes --]

> It looks like I'll have get the old libstdc++.so.27 and I should be in
> business. I see that in rpmfind there's a libc-5.4.46-2 RPM for i386
> that provides libstdc++.so.27. I've downloaded but not yet installed
> it.
> 
> It looks like I should simply install this old libc-5, and it will
> provide the libstdc++.27 that I need. However, I hope this
> installation of old libraries won't upset my system.  
> 
> I mention all this in the hope will confirm I'm on the right track and
> that I should not suffer ill effects from installing the RPM.

Everything you've said sounds reasonable, and just installing the RPM
should work.

Having said that, you might want to use the following, slightly
convoluted, method to install, as this should make any errors easier
to recover from.

1) Copy /lib/* into /lib.bak
2) Add a line ``/lib.bak'' at the top of /etc/ld.so.conf.
3) Run ldconfig. This is usually /sbin/ldconfig, but occasionally
/lib/ldconfig
4) Install the RPM.
5) From a shell, go ``export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib''. Any programs started
from that shell will now use the new libc. If it suffers ugly errors,
copy /lib.bak back into /lib and rerun ldconfig. You might want to
give the --remove-destination switch to cp. Obviously, it will be
easier to run cp from a shell which isn't broken.
6) If there are no errors, remove the /lib.bak line from ld.so.conf and rerun
ldconfig. All programs started from now on should use the new libc.
I would recommend rebooting at this point.

If, after you've rebooted, nothing works any more, try booting again
but specifying LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib.bak on the command line.

Once everything's working, you can remove lib.bak.

It might be a good idea to have SASH installed before you try this,
as it doesn't need libc and might be useful for recovering if something
goes wrong. Boot disks and rescue disks are also useful.

Steven Smith,
sos22@cam.ac.uk.

Disclaimer: I'm not going to blow away my libc just to test this for you.
Sorry.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

Re: Phantom executables

[Elias Athanasopoulos]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 05:08:58PM -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> I installed RedHat 7.2 on new hardware, and have been haunted by a
> frequent problem. When I try to run certain binary exectables, I get:
> 
> [brownh@langhans tex2rtf]$ ./163nogui
> bash: ./163nogui: No such file or directory

Recompile. The 'file' that bash can't find is the dynamic linker. 
You'll get the same results with:

% ldd ./163nogui

Elias

-- 
http://gnewtellium.sourceforge.net			MP3 is not a crime.	
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

Re: DVI to RTF

[Steven Smith]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 339 bytes --]

> Basically I have the LaTeX source file and would like to have the
> document in RTF format too.  Is this possible? 
I don't know of any way to convert a DVI to RTF, but you should be able
to convert LaTeX using latex2rtf (latex2rtf.sourceforge.net).

(Disclaimer: I've never tried this program.)

Steven Smith,
sos22@cam.ac.uk.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]