linux-next: duplicate patch in the dt-krzk tree

linux-next: duplicate patch in the dt-krzk tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 328 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  b112d9ffaa65 ("ARM: dts: vt8500: use correct ohci/ehci node names")

This is commit

  7dc891191e64 ("ARM: dts: vt8500: use correct ohci/ehci node names")

in the arm-soc tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the dt-krzk tree

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 12/05/2025 06:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>   b112d9ffaa65 ("ARM: dts: vt8500: use correct ohci/ehci node names")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   7dc891191e64 ("ARM: dts: vt8500: use correct ohci/ehci node names")

I will drop mine, but I am surprised that this patch appeared in
arm-soc. soc@ was not Cced on the patchset.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the dt-krzk tree

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Mon, May 12, 2025, at 08:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/05/2025 06:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit
>> (but the same patch):
>> 
>>   b112d9ffaa65 ("ARM: dts: vt8500: use correct ohci/ehci node names")
>> 
>> This is commit
>> 
>>   7dc891191e64 ("ARM: dts: vt8500: use correct ohci/ehci node names")
>
> I will drop mine, but I am surprised that this patch appeared in
> arm-soc. soc@ was not Cced on the patchset.

My mistake. I think what happened was that patch 0/5 and 3/5
(the one for spear) of the series were sent to soc@lists.linux.dev:

https://lore.kernel.org/soc/20250330193833.21970-7-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/T/#t

I had some problems with patchwork recently and picked up some of
the missing bits through b4, which always applies the entire
series. I made sure that the patch themselves were ok and I saw
your Reviewed-by tag, but I didn't realize that I was not the
recipient for patches 1, 2, 4 and 5.

      Arnd