* Re: drm-rust: change branches merged into linux-next
[not found] ` <afCi7hSqv6AeGfeo@orome>
@ 2026-05-06 23:24 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-07 7:55 ` Thierry Reding
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2026-05-06 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding; +Cc: Mark Brown, Alice Ryhl, Thierry Reding, linux-next
On Tue Apr 28, 2026 at 2:08 PM CEST, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 10:52:36PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> >
>> > drm-rust https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#drm-rust-next
>> > drm-rust-fixes https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#drm-rust-fixes
>> >
>> > to
>> >
>> > drm-rust https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#for-linux-next
>> > drm-rust-fixes https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#for-linux-next-fixes
>
> Sorry, I noticed this too late. I've updated these now, so they should
> be pulled for tomorrow's -next. I'm about to finish things up for today,
> so it'll have the old trees still.
Checking today's linux-next tree, it still seems to pull in the "old" branches.
This by itself is not a problem; until -rc6 they are exactly the same.
However, I noticed that it seems that linux-next stopped fetching new updates
from the drm-rust remote.
The current head of drm-rust-fixes should be at
0a69ac25bd596d50823d530d0a2004336668c0df, and drm-rust-next should be at
37f748ed0c19e007e7c5677f5d605d6b93841792 (same goes for the new branches).
However, today's linux-next release still shows:
$ cat Next/SHA1s | grep drm-rust
drm-rust-fixes 15e8bae5d930c91b8739a87d75db0a6efca3cb32
drm-rust d9a6809478f9815b6455a327aa001737ac7b2c09
d9a6809478f9815b6455a327aa001737ac7b2c09 has "CommitDate: Mon Apr 27 18:43:05
2026"; the next commit in my history has "CommitDate: Wed Apr 29 00:57:54 2026
+0200".
Thanks,
Danilo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: drm-rust: change branches merged into linux-next
2026-05-06 23:24 ` drm-rust: change branches merged into linux-next Danilo Krummrich
@ 2026-05-07 7:55 ` Thierry Reding
2026-05-07 11:47 ` Thierry Reding
2026-05-08 18:52 ` Danilo Krummrich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2026-05-07 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danilo Krummrich; +Cc: Thierry Reding, Mark Brown, Alice Ryhl, linux-next
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1953 bytes --]
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 01:24:38AM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue Apr 28, 2026 at 2:08 PM CEST, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 10:52:36PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> >> >
> >> > drm-rust https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#drm-rust-next
> >> > drm-rust-fixes https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#drm-rust-fixes
> >> >
> >> > to
> >> >
> >> > drm-rust https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#for-linux-next
> >> > drm-rust-fixes https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#for-linux-next-fixes
> >
> > Sorry, I noticed this too late. I've updated these now, so they should
> > be pulled for tomorrow's -next. I'm about to finish things up for today,
> > so it'll have the old trees still.
>
> Checking today's linux-next tree, it still seems to pull in the "old" branches.
> This by itself is not a problem; until -rc6 they are exactly the same.
>
> However, I noticed that it seems that linux-next stopped fetching new updates
> from the drm-rust remote.
>
> The current head of drm-rust-fixes should be at
> 0a69ac25bd596d50823d530d0a2004336668c0df, and drm-rust-next should be at
> 37f748ed0c19e007e7c5677f5d605d6b93841792 (same goes for the new branches).
>
> However, today's linux-next release still shows:
>
> $ cat Next/SHA1s | grep drm-rust
> drm-rust-fixes 15e8bae5d930c91b8739a87d75db0a6efca3cb32
> drm-rust d9a6809478f9815b6455a327aa001737ac7b2c09
>
> d9a6809478f9815b6455a327aa001737ac7b2c09 has "CommitDate: Mon Apr 27 18:43:05
> 2026"; the next commit in my history has "CommitDate: Wed Apr 29 00:57:54 2026
> +0200".
Sorry, looks like a rookie mistake on my side. The scripts were fetching
the correct branches but merging the old ones. I should've realized that
I need to update both the git config *and* the control file.
Should be fixed in today's -next.
Thanks for letting me know,
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: drm-rust: change branches merged into linux-next
2026-05-07 7:55 ` Thierry Reding
@ 2026-05-07 11:47 ` Thierry Reding
2026-05-08 18:52 ` Danilo Krummrich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2026-05-07 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danilo Krummrich; +Cc: Thierry Reding, Mark Brown, Alice Ryhl, linux-next
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2229 bytes --]
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 01:24:38AM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > On Tue Apr 28, 2026 at 2:08 PM CEST, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 10:52:36PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > drm-rust https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#drm-rust-next
> > >> > drm-rust-fixes https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#drm-rust-fixes
> > >> >
> > >> > to
> > >> >
> > >> > drm-rust https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#for-linux-next
> > >> > drm-rust-fixes https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/rust/kernel.git#for-linux-next-fixes
> > >
> > > Sorry, I noticed this too late. I've updated these now, so they should
> > > be pulled for tomorrow's -next. I'm about to finish things up for today,
> > > so it'll have the old trees still.
> >
> > Checking today's linux-next tree, it still seems to pull in the "old" branches.
> > This by itself is not a problem; until -rc6 they are exactly the same.
> >
> > However, I noticed that it seems that linux-next stopped fetching new updates
> > from the drm-rust remote.
> >
> > The current head of drm-rust-fixes should be at
> > 0a69ac25bd596d50823d530d0a2004336668c0df, and drm-rust-next should be at
> > 37f748ed0c19e007e7c5677f5d605d6b93841792 (same goes for the new branches).
> >
> > However, today's linux-next release still shows:
> >
> > $ cat Next/SHA1s | grep drm-rust
> > drm-rust-fixes 15e8bae5d930c91b8739a87d75db0a6efca3cb32
> > drm-rust d9a6809478f9815b6455a327aa001737ac7b2c09
> >
> > d9a6809478f9815b6455a327aa001737ac7b2c09 has "CommitDate: Mon Apr 27 18:43:05
> > 2026"; the next commit in my history has "CommitDate: Wed Apr 29 00:57:54 2026
> > +0200".
>
> Sorry, looks like a rookie mistake on my side. The scripts were fetching
> the correct branches but merging the old ones. I should've realized that
> I need to update both the git config *and* the control file.
>
> Should be fixed in today's -next.
Looking good:
$ grep drm-rust Next/SHA1s
drm-rust-fixes 0a69ac25bd596d50823d530d0a2004336668c0df
drm-rust 37f748ed0c19e007e7c5677f5d605d6b93841792
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: drm-rust: change branches merged into linux-next
2026-05-07 7:55 ` Thierry Reding
2026-05-07 11:47 ` Thierry Reding
@ 2026-05-08 18:52 ` Danilo Krummrich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2026-05-08 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding; +Cc: Thierry Reding, Mark Brown, Alice Ryhl, linux-next
On Thu May 7, 2026 at 9:55 AM CEST, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Should be fixed in today's -next.
Yes, looks good now, thanks!
- Danilo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-08 18:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <DI3DUMHIM5CI.2FMKD5MSWVCAU@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <ae6GpnWSb4Mcel_Q@sirena.co.uk>
[not found] ` <afCi7hSqv6AeGfeo@orome>
2026-05-06 23:24 ` drm-rust: change branches merged into linux-next Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-07 7:55 ` Thierry Reding
2026-05-07 11:47 ` Thierry Reding
2026-05-08 18:52 ` Danilo Krummrich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox