From: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: neilb@suse.de, bfields@fieldses.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
gnb@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 06/35] svc: Add transport specific xpo_release function
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:35:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191342937.1565.16.camel@trinity.ogc.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D6D83B86-2A07-44F2-A729-9BF9DD74A6D4@oracle.com>
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 11:18 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Tom Tucker wrote:
> >
[...snip...]
> >
> > struct svc_xprt_class {
>
> You intend to add xpo_detach and xpo_free in a later patch. The
> method names suggest all of these operate on the svc_xprt.
> xpo_release, however appears to operate on a request, not on a svc_xprt.
It's a little of both. It allows a transport to handle
transport-specific context information that is cached in the rqstp
structure.
>
> Perhaps you might name this method xpo_release_rqst or some other
> name that indicates that this operates on a request. The name
> xpo_release could easily refer to closing the underlying socket. As
> an example, the client-side transport uses ->release_request.
Yes, I like your name better.
>
> The client side also appears to treat the transport as handling
> requests, instead of socket reads and writes. The use of the method
> names recvfrom and sendto suggest we are talking about bytes on a
> socket here, not transmitting and receiving whole RPC requests. I
> think that's a useful abstraction.
>
> While I'm whining aloud... I don't prefer the method names detach or
> free, either. On the client side we used close and destroy, which
> (to me, anyway) makes more sense.
>
Perhaps, but these names match what is actually done: detach disconnects
the transport from asynchronous I/O events, and free -- well frees.
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > index 150531f..2d5731c 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > @@ -184,14 +184,14 @@ svc_thread_dequeue(struct svc_pool *pool
> > /*
> > * Release an skbuff after use
> > */
> > -static inline void
> > +static void
> > svc_release_skb(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > {
> > - struct sk_buff *skb = rqstp->rq_skbuff;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb = rqstp->rq_xprt_ctxt;
> > struct svc_deferred_req *dr = rqstp->rq_deferred;
> >
> > if (skb) {
> > - rqstp->rq_skbuff = NULL;
> > + rqstp->rq_xprt_ctxt = NULL;
> >
> > dprintk("svc: service %p, releasing skb %p\n", rqstp, skb);
> > skb_free_datagram(rqstp->rq_sock->sk_sk, skb);
> > @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ svc_sock_release(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > {
> > struct svc_sock *svsk = rqstp->rq_sock;
> >
> > - svc_release_skb(rqstp);
> > + rqstp->rq_xprt->xpt_ops.xpo_release(rqstp);
> >
> > svc_free_res_pages(rqstp);
> > rqstp->rq_res.page_len = 0;
> > @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > skb_free_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > - rqstp->rq_skbuff = skb;
> > + rqstp->rq_xprt_ctxt = skb;
> > }
> >
> > rqstp->rq_arg.page_base = 0;
> > @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ svc_udp_sendto(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_udp_ops = {
> > .xpo_recvfrom = svc_udp_recvfrom,
> > .xpo_sendto = svc_udp_sendto,
> > + .xpo_release = svc_release_skb,
> > };
> >
> > static struct svc_xprt_class svc_udp_class = {
> > @@ -1290,7 +1291,7 @@ svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > rqstp->rq_arg.page_len = len - rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len;
> > }
> >
> > - rqstp->rq_skbuff = NULL;
> > + rqstp->rq_xprt_ctxt = NULL;
> > rqstp->rq_prot = IPPROTO_TCP;
> >
> > /* Reset TCP read info */
> > @@ -1356,6 +1357,7 @@ svc_tcp_sendto(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_tcp_ops = {
> > .xpo_recvfrom = svc_tcp_recvfrom,
> > .xpo_sendto = svc_tcp_sendto,
> > + .xpo_release = svc_release_skb,
> > };
> >
> > static struct svc_xprt_class svc_tcp_class = {
> > @@ -1577,7 +1579,7 @@ svc_send(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > }
> >
> > /* release the receive skb before sending the reply */
> > - svc_release_skb(rqstp);
> > + rqstp->rq_xprt->xpt_ops.xpo_release(rqstp);
> >
> > /* calculate over-all length */
> > xb = & rqstp->rq_res;
>
> Chuck Lever
> chuck.lever@oracle.com
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-02 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-01 19:14 [RFC,PATCH 00/35] SVC Transport Switch Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 01/35] svc: Add an svc transport class Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 02/35] svc: Make svc_sock the tcp/udp transport Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 03/35] svc: Change the svc_sock in the rqstp structure to a transport Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 04/35] svc: Add a max payload value to the transport Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 14:54 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:28 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 11:09 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-03 14:26 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 15:18 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-04 1:10 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 05/35] svc: Move sk_sendto and sk_recvfrom to svc_xprt_class Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:04 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:29 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:57 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 18:24 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 18:30 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 18:47 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 19:55 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 20:29 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 20:35 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 20:38 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-04 1:34 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-04 1:21 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-03 11:13 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 06/35] svc: Add transport specific xpo_release function Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:18 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:35 ` Tom Tucker [this message]
2007-10-04 1:48 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 07/35] svc: Add per-transport delete functions Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 08/35] svc: Add xpo_prep_reply_hdr Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 09/35] svc: Add a transport function that checks for write space Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 10/35] svc: Move close processing to a single place Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC,PATCH 11/35] svc: Add xpo_accept transport function Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:33 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:41 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 17:07 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 18:28 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 18:49 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-04 1:54 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 12/35] svc: Add a generic transport svc_create_xprt function Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:39 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-03 20:01 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 20:04 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-04 2:30 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-04 15:18 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-01 19:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 13/35] svc: Change services to use new svc_create_xprt service Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:44 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:45 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 15:25 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-03 16:23 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-04 2:35 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-04 14:27 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-09 17:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-09 18:32 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-09 19:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-09 20:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 14/35] svc: Change sk_inuse to a kref Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 11:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-10-03 14:39 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 14:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-03 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-10-03 15:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-03 15:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-10-08 3:52 ` Neil Brown
2007-10-03 15:13 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-03 15:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-04 2:51 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 15/35] svc: Move sk_flags to the svc_xprt structure Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 16/35] svc: Move sk_server and sk_pool to svc_xprt Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 17/35] svc: Make close transport independent Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 18/35] svc: Move sk_reserved to svc_xprt Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 19/35] svc: Make the enqueue service transport neutral and export it Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 20/35] svc: Make svc_send transport neutral Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:15 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:46 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:54 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-04 2:59 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 21/35] svc: Change svc_sock_received to svc_xprt_received and export it Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:18 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 22/35] svc: Remove sk_lastrecv Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 23/35] svc: Move the authinfo cache to svc_xprt Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 24/35] svc: Make deferral processing xprt independent Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 25/35] svc: Move the sockaddr information to svc_xprt Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:34 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:50 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 26/35] svc: Make svc_sock_release svc_xprt_release Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 27/35] svc: Make svc_recv transport neutral Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:36 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 28/35] svc: Make svc_age_temp_sockets svc_age_temp_transports Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 29/35] svc: Move common create logic to common code Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 16:42 ` Chuck Lever
2007-10-02 16:51 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 30/35] svc: Removing remaining references to rq_sock in rqstp Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 31/35] svc: Make svc_check_conn_limits xprt independent Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 32/35] svc: Move the xprt independent code to the svc_xprt.c file Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 33/35] svc: Add transport hdr size for defer/revisit Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC,PATCH 34/35] svc: Add /proc/sys/sunrpc/transport files Tom Tucker
2007-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 35/35] knfsd: Support adding transports by writing portlist file Tom Tucker
2007-10-02 15:25 ` [RFC,PATCH 00/35] SVC Transport Switch J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-02 16:18 ` Tom Tucker
2007-10-03 11:03 ` Greg Banks
2007-10-03 14:02 ` Tom Tucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191342937.1565.16.camel@trinity.ogc.int \
--to=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=gnb@sgi.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox