public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN handling in Linux/NFS
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:58:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258747113.2494.81.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117042123.1563.20912.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 15:21 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: 
> NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN is returned by the server when an operation cannot be
> performed because the file is currently open and local (to the server)
> semantics prohibit the operation while the file is open.
> A typical case is a RENAME operation on an MS-Windows platform, which
> prevents rename while the file is open.
> 
> While it is possible that such a condition is transitory, it is also
> very possible that the file will be held open for an extended period
> of time thus preventing the operation.
> 
> The current behaviour of Linux/NFS is to retry the operation
> indefinitely.  This is not appropriate - we do not expect a rename to
> take an arbitrary amount of time to complete.
> 
> Rather, an error should be returned.  The most obvious error code
> would be EBUSY, which is a legal at least for 'rename' and 'unlink',
> and accurately captures the reason for the error.
> 
> This patch allows a few retries until about 2 seconds have elapsed,
> then returns EBUSY.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
> 
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |    5 +++++
>  fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c  |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index ff37454..be26c0c 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -275,6 +275,11 @@ static int nfs4_handle_exception(const struct nfs_server *server, int errorcode,
>  			/* FALLTHROUGH */
>  #endif /* !defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1) */
>  		case -NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN:
> +			if (exception->timeout > HZ)
> +				/* We have retried a decent amount, time to
> +				 * fail
> +				 */
> +				break;
>  		case -NFS4ERR_GRACE:
>  		case -NFS4ERR_DELAY:
>  			ret = nfs4_delay(server->client, &exception->timeout);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
> index 20b4e30..e50246d 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
> @@ -5684,6 +5684,7 @@ static struct {
>  	{ NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,	-ELOOP		},
>  	{ NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL,	-EOPNOTSUPP	},
>  	{ NFS4ERR_DEADLOCK,	-EDEADLK	},
> +	{ NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN,	-EBUSY		},
>  	{ NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC,	-EPERM		}, /* FIXME: this needs
>  						    * to be handled by a
>  						    * middle-layer.
> 
> 

If you add an entry for NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN into nfs4_stat_to_errno(),
then the result of the RPC call will be -EBUSY rather than
NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN.
In that case, I can't see how the NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN is being propagated
to nfs4_handle_exception().

See
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git&a=commitdiff&h=52567b03ca38b6e556ced450d64dba8d66e23b0e for how we fixed up a similar problem with NFS4ERR_RESOURCE...

Cheers
  Trond

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-20 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-17  4:21 [PATCH 0/2] Some fixes for NFS NeilBrown
     [not found] ` <20091117042004.1563.95871.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-17  4:21   ` [PATCH 1/2] NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN handling in Linux/NFS NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20091117042123.1563.20912.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-20 19:58       ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2009-11-24  2:56         ` Neil Brown
2009-11-17  4:21   ` [PATCH 2/2] NFS: honour preferred rsize/wsize reported by server NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1258747113.2494.81.camel@localhost \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox