From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] pnfs-submit: separate locking from get and put of layout
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:46:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276566375-24566-2-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276566375-24566-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>
This is needed by next patch that changes refcounting
Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 3f7f50a..937b84a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -320,30 +320,20 @@ pnfs_unregister_layoutdriver(struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *ld_type)
#define BUG_ON_UNLOCKED_LO(lo) do {} while (0)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-/*
- * get and lock nfsi->layout
- */
static inline struct pnfs_layout_type *
-get_lock_current_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
+get_current_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
{
- struct pnfs_layout_type *lo;
+ struct pnfs_layout_type *lo = &nfsi->layout;
- lo = &nfsi->layout;
- spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
- if (!lo->ld_data) {
- spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
+ BUG_ON_UNLOCKED_LO(lo);
+ if (!lo->ld_data)
return NULL;
- }
-
lo->refcount++;
return lo;
}
-/*
- * put and unlock nfs->layout
- */
static inline void
-put_unlock_current_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo)
+put_current_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo)
{
struct nfs_inode *nfsi = PNFS_NFS_INODE(lo);
struct nfs_client *clp;
@@ -365,7 +355,6 @@ put_unlock_current_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo)
list_del_init(&lo->lo_layouts);
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
}
- spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
}
void
@@ -377,7 +366,8 @@ pnfs_layout_release(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo,
spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
if (range)
pnfs_free_layout(lo, range);
- put_unlock_current_layout(lo);
+ put_current_layout(lo);
+ spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
wake_up_all(&nfsi->lo_waitq);
}
@@ -391,9 +381,13 @@ pnfs_destroy_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
.length = NFS4_MAX_UINT64,
};
- lo = get_lock_current_layout(nfsi);
- pnfs_free_layout(lo, &range);
- put_unlock_current_layout(lo);
+ spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
+ lo = get_current_layout(nfsi);
+ if (lo) {
+ pnfs_free_layout(lo, &range);
+ put_current_layout(lo);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
}
static inline void
@@ -760,12 +754,14 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct nfs4_pnfs_layout_segment *range,
arg.length = NFS4_MAX_UINT64;
if (type == RETURN_FILE) {
- lo = get_lock_current_layout(nfsi);
+ spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
+ lo = get_current_layout(nfsi);
if (lo && !has_layout_to_return(lo, &arg)) {
- put_unlock_current_layout(lo);
+ put_current_layout(lo);
lo = NULL;
}
if (!lo) {
+ spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
dprintk("%s: no layout segments to return\n", __func__);
goto out;
}
@@ -779,7 +775,8 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct nfs4_pnfs_layout_segment *range,
if (stateid) { /* callback */
status = -EAGAIN;
spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
- put_unlock_current_layout(lo);
+ put_current_layout(lo);
+ spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
goto out;
}
dprintk("%s: waiting\n", __func__);
@@ -924,8 +921,7 @@ static int pnfs_wait_schedule(void *word)
* get, possibly allocate, and lock current_layout
*
* Note: If successful, nfsi->lo_lock is taken and the caller
- * must put and unlock current_layout by using put_unlock_current_layout()
- * when the returned layout is released.
+ * must put and unlock current_layout when the returned layout is released.
*/
static struct pnfs_layout_type *
get_lock_alloc_layout(struct inode *ino)
@@ -936,7 +932,9 @@ get_lock_alloc_layout(struct inode *ino)
dprintk("%s Begin\n", __func__);
- while ((lo = get_lock_current_layout(nfsi)) == NULL) {
+ spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
+ while ((lo = get_current_layout(nfsi)) == NULL) {
+ spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
/* Compete against other threads on who's doing the allocation,
* wait until bit is cleared if we lost this race.
*/
@@ -952,8 +950,10 @@ get_lock_alloc_layout(struct inode *ino)
/* Was current_layout already allocated while we slept?
* If so, retry get_lock'ing it. Otherwise, allocate it.
*/
- if (nfsi->layout.ld_data)
+ if (nfsi->layout.ld_data) {
+ spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
continue;
+ }
lo = alloc_init_layout(ino);
if (lo) {
@@ -1122,7 +1122,8 @@ out:
out_put:
if (lsegpp)
*lsegpp = lseg;
- put_unlock_current_layout(lo);
+ put_current_layout(lo);
+ spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
goto out;
}
@@ -1338,11 +1339,13 @@ pnfs_getboundary(struct inode *inode)
goto out;
nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
- lo = get_lock_current_layout(nfsi);;
+ spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
+ lo = get_current_layout(nfsi);;
if (lo) {
stripe_size = policy_ops->get_stripesize(lo);
- put_unlock_current_layout(lo);
+ put_current_layout(lo);
}
+ spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
out:
return stripe_size;
}
--
1.6.6.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-15 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-15 1:46 [PATCH 00/10] layout refcounting changes Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` Fred Isaman [this message]
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 02/10] pnfs-submit: split get_layout and grab_current_layout Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 03/10] pnfs-submit: remove list_empty check from put_layout Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 04/10] pnfs-submit: add backpointer to pnfs_layout_type Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 05/10] pnfs-submit: Move pnfs_layout_state and pnfs_layout_suspend back to nfs_inode Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 06/10] pnfs-submit: Add state flag for layoutcommit_needed Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 07/10] pnfs-submit: avoid race handling return on close Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 08/10] pnfs-submit: change nfsi->layout to a pointer Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 09/10] pnfs-submit: API change: alloc_layout returns layout cache head Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 10/10] pnfs-submit: filelayout: adjust to new alloc_layout API Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] pnfs-submit: avoid race handling return on close Benny Halevy
2010-06-15 17:32 ` Fred Isaman
[not found] ` <AANLkTilDj2Ua_t77kk5Gj_t0vqEcOJFKlqODAj18KQnm-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 17:33 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1276623230.8767.48.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 17:52 ` Fred Isaman
[not found] ` <AANLkTimScICltrCrtEIz7qw1GzuaTGNwCVTk-ZTsZO4_-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 18:19 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1276625991.2988.1.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 18:47 ` Benny Halevy
2010-06-15 17:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] pnfs-submit: add backpointer to pnfs_layout_type Benny Halevy
2010-06-15 16:56 ` [PATCH 03/10] pnfs-submit: remove list_empty check from put_layout Benny Halevy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1276566375-24566-2-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com \
--to=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox