From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] pnfs-submit: remove list_empty check from put_layout
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:56:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C17B0DA.8010206@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276566375-24566-4-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>
On Jun. 14, 2010, 21:46 -0400, Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com> wrote:
> The check on list empty before destroying a layout has always bothered me.
> Get rid of it by having lsegs take a reference on their backpointer.
OK, that should work and be somewhat cleaner than what we have today.
Please see notes below...
>
> Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index 924e6fd..21192b6 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -348,19 +348,27 @@ put_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo)
> BUG_ON_UNLOCKED_LO(lo);
> BUG_ON(lo->refcount <= 0);
>
> - if (--lo->refcount == 0 && list_empty(&lo->segs)) {
> + lo->refcount--;
> +
> + if (lo->refcount > 1)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Make sure is removed from inode list */
> + clp = NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode)->nfs_client;
> + spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> + if (!list_empty(&lo->lo_layouts)) {
> + list_del_init(&lo->lo_layouts);
> + lo->refcount--;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
This is awkward.
If we're already doing this overhaul the right thing to do
is separate out listing/unlisting of the layout on the clp list
so that the lo is added to the clp list when its lo->segs list
goes from empty to not empty (and in this case get_layout can be called
as you did as there's a reference from the clp to the lo)
and when its segs list empties it should be unlisted and
put_layout(), then if its refcount will go back to 0
it can be destroyed.
> +
> + if (lo->refcount == 0) {
In this case I'd like to add a
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&lo->segs))
to make sure that the refcounting agrees with the list manipulation.
Thanks!
Benny
> struct layoutdriver_io_operations *io_ops =
> PNFS_LD_IO_OPS(lo);
>
> dprintk("%s: freeing layout %p\n", __func__, lo->ld_data);
> io_ops->free_layout(lo->ld_data);
> lo->ld_data = NULL;
> -
> - /* Unlist the layout. */
> - clp = NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode)->nfs_client;
> - spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> - list_del_init(&lo->lo_layouts);
> - spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -404,6 +412,7 @@ init_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo, struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> kref_init(&lseg->kref);
> lseg->valid = true;
> lseg->layout = lo;
> + get_layout(lo);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -413,6 +422,7 @@ destroy_lseg(struct kref *kref)
> container_of(kref, struct pnfs_layout_segment, kref);
>
> dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
> + put_layout(lseg->layout);
> PNFS_LD_IO_OPS(lseg->layout)->free_lseg(lseg);
> }
>
> @@ -897,9 +907,10 @@ alloc_init_layout(struct inode *ino)
> void *ld_data;
> struct pnfs_layout_type *lo;
> struct layoutdriver_io_operations *io_ops;
> + struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(ino);
>
> io_ops = NFS_SERVER(ino)->pnfs_curr_ld->ld_io_ops;
> - lo = &NFS_I(ino)->layout;
> + lo = &nfsi->layout;
> ld_data = io_ops->alloc_layout(ino);
> if (!ld_data) {
> printk(KERN_ERR
> @@ -908,11 +919,13 @@ alloc_init_layout(struct inode *ino)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> + spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> BUG_ON(lo->ld_data != NULL);
> lo->ld_data = ld_data;
> memset(&lo->stateid, 0, NFS4_STATEID_SIZE);
> lo->refcount = 1;
> lo->roc_iomode = 0;
> + spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> return lo;
> }
>
> @@ -970,8 +983,10 @@ get_lock_alloc_layout(struct inode *ino)
> spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
>
> spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> - if (list_empty(&lo->lo_layouts))
> + if (list_empty(&lo->lo_layouts)) {
> list_add_tail(&lo->lo_layouts, &clp->cl_layouts);
> + get_layout(lo);
> + }
> spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> } else
> lo = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> @@ -1259,14 +1274,13 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_pnfs_layoutget *lgp)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> init_lseg(lo, lseg);
> lseg->range = res->lseg;
> if (lgp->lsegpp) {
> get_lseg(lseg);
> *lgp->lsegpp = lseg;
> }
> -
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> pnfs_insert_layout(lo, lseg);
>
> if (res->return_on_close) {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-15 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-15 1:46 [PATCH 00/10] layout refcounting changes Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 01/10] pnfs-submit: separate locking from get and put of layout Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 02/10] pnfs-submit: split get_layout and grab_current_layout Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 03/10] pnfs-submit: remove list_empty check from put_layout Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 04/10] pnfs-submit: add backpointer to pnfs_layout_type Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 05/10] pnfs-submit: Move pnfs_layout_state and pnfs_layout_suspend back to nfs_inode Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 06/10] pnfs-submit: Add state flag for layoutcommit_needed Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 07/10] pnfs-submit: avoid race handling return on close Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 08/10] pnfs-submit: change nfsi->layout to a pointer Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 09/10] pnfs-submit: API change: alloc_layout returns layout cache head Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 1:46 ` [PATCH 10/10] pnfs-submit: filelayout: adjust to new alloc_layout API Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] pnfs-submit: avoid race handling return on close Benny Halevy
2010-06-15 17:32 ` Fred Isaman
[not found] ` <AANLkTilDj2Ua_t77kk5Gj_t0vqEcOJFKlqODAj18KQnm-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 17:33 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1276623230.8767.48.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 17:52 ` Fred Isaman
[not found] ` <AANLkTimScICltrCrtEIz7qw1GzuaTGNwCVTk-ZTsZO4_-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 18:19 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1276625991.2988.1.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 18:47 ` Benny Halevy
2010-06-15 17:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] pnfs-submit: add backpointer to pnfs_layout_type Benny Halevy
2010-06-15 16:56 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C17B0DA.8010206@panasas.com \
--to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox