public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] pnfs-submit: remove list_empty check from put_layout
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:56:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C17B0DA.8010206@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276566375-24566-4-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>

On Jun. 14, 2010, 21:46 -0400, Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com> wrote:
> The check on list empty before destroying a layout has always bothered me.
> Get rid of it by having lsegs take a reference on their backpointer.

OK, that should work and be somewhat cleaner than what we have today.
Please see notes below...

> 
> Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/pnfs.c |   36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index 924e6fd..21192b6 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -348,19 +348,27 @@ put_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo)
>  	BUG_ON_UNLOCKED_LO(lo);
>  	BUG_ON(lo->refcount <= 0);
>  
> -	if (--lo->refcount == 0 && list_empty(&lo->segs)) {
> +	lo->refcount--;
> +
> +	if (lo->refcount > 1)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* Make sure is removed from inode list */
> +	clp = NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode)->nfs_client;
> +	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> +	if (!list_empty(&lo->lo_layouts)) {
> +		list_del_init(&lo->lo_layouts);
> +		lo->refcount--;
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);

This is awkward.
If we're already doing this overhaul the right thing to do
is separate out listing/unlisting of the layout on the clp list
so that the lo is added to the clp list when its lo->segs list
goes from empty to not empty (and in this case get_layout can be called
as you did as there's a reference from the clp to the lo)
and when its segs list empties it should be unlisted and
put_layout(), then if its refcount will go back to 0
it can be destroyed.

> +
> +	if (lo->refcount == 0) {

In this case I'd like to add a
		WARN_ON(!list_empty(&lo->segs))
to make sure that the refcounting agrees with the list manipulation.

Thanks!

Benny

>  		struct layoutdriver_io_operations *io_ops =
>  			PNFS_LD_IO_OPS(lo);
>  
>  		dprintk("%s: freeing layout %p\n", __func__, lo->ld_data);
>  		io_ops->free_layout(lo->ld_data);
>  		lo->ld_data = NULL;
> -
> -		/* Unlist the layout. */
> -		clp = NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode)->nfs_client;
> -		spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> -		list_del_init(&lo->lo_layouts);
> -		spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -404,6 +412,7 @@ init_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo, struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>  	kref_init(&lseg->kref);
>  	lseg->valid = true;
>  	lseg->layout = lo;
> +	get_layout(lo);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -413,6 +422,7 @@ destroy_lseg(struct kref *kref)
>  		container_of(kref, struct pnfs_layout_segment, kref);
>  
>  	dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
> +	put_layout(lseg->layout);
>  	PNFS_LD_IO_OPS(lseg->layout)->free_lseg(lseg);
>  }
>  
> @@ -897,9 +907,10 @@ alloc_init_layout(struct inode *ino)
>  	void *ld_data;
>  	struct pnfs_layout_type *lo;
>  	struct layoutdriver_io_operations *io_ops;
> +	struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(ino);
>  
>  	io_ops = NFS_SERVER(ino)->pnfs_curr_ld->ld_io_ops;
> -	lo = &NFS_I(ino)->layout;
> +	lo  = &nfsi->layout;
>  	ld_data = io_ops->alloc_layout(ino);
>  	if (!ld_data) {
>  		printk(KERN_ERR
> @@ -908,11 +919,13 @@ alloc_init_layout(struct inode *ino)
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> +	spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
>  	BUG_ON(lo->ld_data != NULL);
>  	lo->ld_data = ld_data;
>  	memset(&lo->stateid, 0, NFS4_STATEID_SIZE);
>  	lo->refcount = 1;
>  	lo->roc_iomode = 0;
> +	spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
>  	return lo;
>  }
>  
> @@ -970,8 +983,10 @@ get_lock_alloc_layout(struct inode *ino)
>  			spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
>  
>  			spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> -			if (list_empty(&lo->lo_layouts))
> +			if (list_empty(&lo->lo_layouts)) {
>  				list_add_tail(&lo->lo_layouts, &clp->cl_layouts);
> +				get_layout(lo);
> +			}
>  			spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
>  		} else
>  			lo = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> @@ -1259,14 +1274,13 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_pnfs_layoutget *lgp)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
>  	init_lseg(lo, lseg);
>  	lseg->range = res->lseg;
>  	if (lgp->lsegpp) {
>  		get_lseg(lseg);
>  		*lgp->lsegpp = lseg;
>  	}
> -
> -	spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
>  	pnfs_insert_layout(lo, lseg);
>  
>  	if (res->return_on_close) {


      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-15 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-15  1:46 [PATCH 00/10] layout refcounting changes Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46 ` [PATCH 01/10] pnfs-submit: separate locking from get and put of layout Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46   ` [PATCH 02/10] pnfs-submit: split get_layout and grab_current_layout Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46     ` [PATCH 03/10] pnfs-submit: remove list_empty check from put_layout Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46       ` [PATCH 04/10] pnfs-submit: add backpointer to pnfs_layout_type Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46         ` [PATCH 05/10] pnfs-submit: Move pnfs_layout_state and pnfs_layout_suspend back to nfs_inode Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46           ` [PATCH 06/10] pnfs-submit: Add state flag for layoutcommit_needed Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46             ` [PATCH 07/10] pnfs-submit: avoid race handling return on close Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46               ` [PATCH 08/10] pnfs-submit: change nfsi->layout to a pointer Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46                 ` [PATCH 09/10] pnfs-submit: API change: alloc_layout returns layout cache head Fred Isaman
2010-06-15  1:46                   ` [PATCH 10/10] pnfs-submit: filelayout: adjust to new alloc_layout API Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 17:06               ` [PATCH 07/10] pnfs-submit: avoid race handling return on close Benny Halevy
2010-06-15 17:32                 ` Fred Isaman
     [not found]                   ` <AANLkTilDj2Ua_t77kk5Gj_t0vqEcOJFKlqODAj18KQnm-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 17:33                     ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]                       ` <1276623230.8767.48.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 17:52                         ` Fred Isaman
     [not found]                           ` <AANLkTimScICltrCrtEIz7qw1GzuaTGNwCVTk-ZTsZO4_-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 18:19                             ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]                               ` <1276625991.2988.1.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-15 18:47                                 ` Benny Halevy
2010-06-15 17:00         ` [PATCH 04/10] pnfs-submit: add backpointer to pnfs_layout_type Benny Halevy
2010-06-15 16:56       ` Benny Halevy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C17B0DA.8010206@panasas.com \
    --to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox