public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
	Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>,
	Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] SQUASHME: Generalize the device cache so it can be used by all layouts
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:42:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284320533.7880.131.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C8D07D5.6010006@panasas.com>

On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 19:03 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Current code thinks that there can be a single device_id per
> layout segment. Change that to assume no relations between segments
> and device_ids. It's now up to the layout-driver to make any relations.
> 
> Files layout driver is fixed in next patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/pnfs.c             |   20 +++++---------------
>  include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h |    6 +-----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index eb4e092..f26abc0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -1892,26 +1892,16 @@ nfs4_init_deviceid_node(struct nfs4_deviceid *d)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(nfs4_init_deviceid_node);
>  
> -/* Called from layoutdriver_io_operations->alloc_lseg */
> -void
> -nfs4_set_layout_deviceid(struct pnfs_layout_segment *l, struct nfs4_deviceid *d)
> -{
> -	dprintk("%s [%d]\n", __func__, atomic_read(&d->de_kref.refcount));
> -	l->deviceid = d;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(nfs4_set_layout_deviceid);
> -
>  /* Called from layoutdriver_io_operations->free_lseg */
>  void
> -nfs4_put_unset_layout_deviceid(struct pnfs_layout_segment *l,
> -			   struct nfs4_deviceid *d,
> -			   void (*free_callback)(struct kref *))
> +nfs4_put_deviceid(struct nfs4_deviceid_cache *c,
> +			   struct nfs4_deviceid *d)
>  {
>  	dprintk("%s [%d]\n", __func__, atomic_read(&d->de_kref.refcount));
> -	l->deviceid = NULL;
> -	kref_put(&d->de_kref, free_callback);
> +	kref_put(&d->de_kref, c->dc_free_callback);
> +	/* Do we need to return the deviceid_cache ref */
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(nfs4_put_unset_layout_deviceid);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nfs4_put_deviceid);
>  
>  /* Find and reference a deviceid */
>  struct nfs4_deviceid *
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h b/include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h
> index 577cd2b..dc3410e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h
> @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ struct pnfs_layout_segment {
>  	struct kref kref;
>  	bool valid;
>  	struct pnfs_layout_hdr *layout;
> -	struct nfs4_deviceid *deviceid;
>  	u8 ld_data[];			/* layout driver private data */
>  };
>  
> @@ -287,11 +286,8 @@ extern struct nfs4_deviceid *nfs4_find_get_deviceid(
>  				struct pnfs_deviceid *);
>  extern struct nfs4_deviceid *nfs4_add_get_deviceid(struct nfs4_deviceid_cache *,
>  				struct nfs4_deviceid *);
> -extern void nfs4_set_layout_deviceid(struct pnfs_layout_segment *,
> +extern void nfs4_put_deviceid(struct nfs4_deviceid_cache *,
>  				struct nfs4_deviceid *);
> -extern void nfs4_put_unset_layout_deviceid(struct pnfs_layout_segment *,
> -				struct nfs4_deviceid *,
> -				void (*free_callback)(struct kref *));
>  extern void nfs4_delete_device(struct nfs4_deviceid_cache *,
>  				struct pnfs_deviceid *);
>  

This doesn't look like it needs to be part of the initial single-layout
submission. Why is it being labelled as a squashme?

Trond

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-12 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-12 17:01 [RFC 0/3] Ugliness in struct pnfs_layout_segment and possible uselessness of the device cache Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12 17:03 ` [RFC 1/3] SQUASHME: Generalize the device cache so it can be used by all layouts Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12 19:42   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2010-09-13  9:50     ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-13 12:16       ` Fred Isaman
2010-09-13 12:45         ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12 17:05 ` [RFC 2/3] SQUASHME: fileslayout: Adjust to device_cache API changes Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12 17:06 ` [RFC 3/3] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: Use the generic device cache Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12 17:31   ` Boaz Harrosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1284320533.7880.131.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=andros@netapp.com \
    --cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox