From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] SQUASHME: Generalize the device cache so it can be used by all layouts
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:45:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8E1CD9.1040404@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJXRe7QWhPD5OV9KA9uUribFXwSenmbJyqnzk1@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/13/2010 02:16 PM, Fred Isaman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:
>>> This doesn't look like it needs to be part of the initial single-layout
>>> submission. Why is it being labelled as a squashme?
>>>
>>> Trond
>>
>> No, this is a device_id cache per nfs-client it is part of the initial
>> getdeviceinfo call. Many "single-layout" may refer to the same device_id
>> therefor it is cached so the long getdeviceinfo call can be done only once.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Boaz
>
> I agree. I'll roll it into the next submission.
>
> Fred
Thanks Fred. I would like if you can report that it actually works, as I have
not tested it.
BTW. For the objects I have decided to not keep a reference on the device_id
during the lseg life span, but just keep a reference to the underlying osd_device
so the device_id can be removed from the cache but still be used by a
layout_seg/io_state. I have tested and it works and apparently it unmounts
cleanly without any reference leaks. Will post patches later once the new API
hits Benny's tree.
Thanks
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-13 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-12 17:01 [RFC 0/3] Ugliness in struct pnfs_layout_segment and possible uselessness of the device cache Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12 17:03 ` [RFC 1/3] SQUASHME: Generalize the device cache so it can be used by all layouts Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12 19:42 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-09-13 9:50 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-13 12:16 ` Fred Isaman
2010-09-13 12:45 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2010-09-12 17:05 ` [RFC 2/3] SQUASHME: fileslayout: Adjust to device_cache API changes Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12 17:06 ` [RFC 3/3] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: Use the generic device cache Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12 17:31 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C8E1CD9.1040404@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=andros@netapp.com \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox