From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org
Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:12:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405624354-22388-6-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405624354-22388-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com>
Currently, both destroy_revoked_delegation and revoke_delegation
manipulate the cl_revoked list without any locking aside from the
client_mutex. Ensure that the clp->cl_lock is held when manipulating it,
except for the list walking in destroy_client. At that point, the client
should no longer be in use, and so it should be safe to walk the list
without any locking. That also means that we don't need to do the
list_splice_init there either.
Also, the fact that destroy_revoked_delegation and revoke_delegation
delete dl_recall_lru without any locking makes it difficult to know
whether they're doing so safely in all cases. Move the list_del_init
calls into the callers, and add WARN_ONs in the event that these calls
are passed a delegation that has a non-empty list_head.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 4e42c3823a8a..ca8b4d0e712b 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ unhash_delegation_locked(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
static void destroy_revoked_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
{
- list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dp->dl_recall_lru));
nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
}
@@ -685,11 +685,15 @@ static void revoke_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
{
struct nfs4_client *clp = dp->dl_stid.sc_client;
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dp->dl_recall_lru));
+
if (clp->cl_minorversion == 0)
destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
else {
dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_REVOKED_DELEG_STID;
- list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &clp->cl_revoked);
+ spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
+ list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &clp->cl_revoked);
+ spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
}
}
@@ -1458,9 +1462,9 @@ destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
}
- list_splice_init(&clp->cl_revoked, &reaplist);
- while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
+ while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_revoked)) {
dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
+ list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
}
while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_openowners)) {
@@ -3883,8 +3887,10 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
}
spin_unlock(&state_lock);
- list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &reaplist) {
- dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
+ while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
+ dp = list_first_entry(&reaplist, struct nfs4_delegation,
+ dl_recall_lru);
+ list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
revoke_delegation(dp);
}
list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->close_lru) {
@@ -4228,6 +4234,9 @@ nfsd4_free_stateid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
break;
case NFS4_REVOKED_DELEG_STID:
dp = delegstateid(s);
+ spin_lock(&cl->cl_lock);
+ list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
+ spin_unlock(&cl->cl_lock);
destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
ret = nfs_ok;
break;
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-17 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 19:12 [PATCH v3 0/6] nfsd: more delegation fixes to prepare for client_mutex removal Jeff Layton
2014-07-17 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfsd: Protect the nfs4_file delegation fields using the fi_lock Jeff Layton
2014-07-17 19:23 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-17 20:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-18 11:27 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 0:21 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-17 19:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: Move the delegation reference counter into the struct nfs4_stid Jeff Layton
2014-07-17 19:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfsd: simplify stateid allocation and file handling Jeff Layton
2014-07-17 19:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: Fix delegation revocation Jeff Layton
2014-07-17 19:12 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-07-17 19:12 ` [PATCH 6/6] nfsd: Convert delegation counter to an atomic_long_t type Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1405624354-22388-6-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com \
--to=jlayton@primarydata.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox