* [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation
@ 2014-08-26 18:30 Trond Myklebust
2014-08-26 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] NFSv4: Don't clear the open state when we just did an OPEN_DOWNGRADE Trond Myklebust
2014-08-26 20:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation Anna Schumaker
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2014-08-26 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs; +Cc: James Drews, jrs
In the presence of delegations, we can no longer assume that the
state->n_rdwr, state->n_rdonly, state->n_wronly reflect the open
stateid share mode, and so we need to need to calculate the initial
value for calldata->arg.fmode using the state->flags.
Reported-by: James Drews <drews@engr.wisc.edu>
Fixes: 88069f77e1ac5 (NFSv41: Fix a potential state leakage when...)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 75ae8d22f067..7d67d5b332d4 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2601,6 +2601,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
struct nfs4_closedata *calldata = data;
struct nfs4_state *state = calldata->state;
struct inode *inode = calldata->inode;
+ bool is_rdonly, is_wronly, is_rdwr;
int call_close = 0;
dprintk("%s: begin!\n", __func__);
@@ -2608,24 +2609,30 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
goto out_wait;
task->tk_msg.rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_OPEN_DOWNGRADE];
- calldata->arg.fmode = FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE;
spin_lock(&state->owner->so_lock);
+ is_rdwr = test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
+ is_rdonly = test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
+ is_wronly = test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
+ spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
+ /* Calculate the current open share mode */
+ calldata->arg.fmode = 0;
+ if (is_rdonly || is_rdwr)
+ calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ;
+ if (is_wronly || is_rdwr)
+ calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE;
/* Calculate the change in open mode */
if (state->n_rdwr == 0) {
if (state->n_rdonly == 0) {
- call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
- call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
+ call_close |= is_rdonly || is_rdwr;
calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_READ;
}
if (state->n_wronly == 0) {
- call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
- call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
+ call_close |= is_wronly || is_rdwr;
calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_WRITE;
}
}
if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state))
call_close = 0;
- spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
if (!call_close) {
/* Note: exit _without_ calling nfs4_close_done */
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] NFSv4: Don't clear the open state when we just did an OPEN_DOWNGRADE
2014-08-26 18:30 [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation Trond Myklebust
@ 2014-08-26 18:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-08-26 20:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation Anna Schumaker
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2014-08-26 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs; +Cc: James Drews, jrs
If we did an OPEN_DOWNGRADE, then the right thing to do on success, is
to apply the new open mode to the struct nfs4_state. Instead, we were
unconditionally clearing the state, making it appear to our state
machinery as if we had just performed a CLOSE.
Fixes: 226056c5c312b (NFSv4: Use correct locking when updating nfs4_state...)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.15+
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 7d67d5b332d4..fe63691822bc 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2560,6 +2560,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
struct nfs4_closedata *calldata = data;
struct nfs4_state *state = calldata->state;
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(calldata->inode);
+ nfs4_stateid *res_stateid = NULL;
dprintk("%s: begin!\n", __func__);
if (!nfs4_sequence_done(task, &calldata->res.seq_res))
@@ -2570,12 +2571,12 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
*/
switch (task->tk_status) {
case 0:
- if (calldata->roc)
+ res_stateid = &calldata->res.stateid;
+ if (calldata->arg.fmode == 0 && calldata->roc)
pnfs_roc_set_barrier(state->inode,
calldata->roc_barrier);
- nfs_clear_open_stateid(state, &calldata->res.stateid, 0);
renew_lease(server, calldata->timestamp);
- goto out_release;
+ break;
case -NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED:
case -NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID:
case -NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID:
@@ -2589,7 +2590,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
goto out_release;
}
}
- nfs_clear_open_stateid(state, NULL, calldata->arg.fmode);
+ nfs_clear_open_stateid(state, res_stateid, calldata->arg.fmode);
out_release:
nfs_release_seqid(calldata->arg.seqid);
nfs_refresh_inode(calldata->inode, calldata->res.fattr);
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation
2014-08-26 18:30 [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation Trond Myklebust
2014-08-26 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] NFSv4: Don't clear the open state when we just did an OPEN_DOWNGRADE Trond Myklebust
@ 2014-08-26 20:11 ` Anna Schumaker
2014-08-26 20:15 ` Trond Myklebust
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anna Schumaker @ 2014-08-26 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust, linux-nfs; +Cc: James Drews, jrs
On 08/26/2014 02:30 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> In the presence of delegations, we can no longer assume that the
> state->n_rdwr, state->n_rdonly, state->n_wronly reflect the open
> stateid share mode, and so we need to need to calculate the initial
Nit: Remove the duplicate "need to" (above).
> value for calldata->arg.fmode using the state->flags.
>
> Reported-by: James Drews <drews@engr.wisc.edu>
> Fixes: 88069f77e1ac5 (NFSv41: Fix a potential state leakage when...)
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 75ae8d22f067..7d67d5b332d4 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -2601,6 +2601,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
> struct nfs4_closedata *calldata = data;
> struct nfs4_state *state = calldata->state;
> struct inode *inode = calldata->inode;
> + bool is_rdonly, is_wronly, is_rdwr;
> int call_close = 0;
>
> dprintk("%s: begin!\n", __func__);
> @@ -2608,24 +2609,30 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
> goto out_wait;
>
> task->tk_msg.rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_OPEN_DOWNGRADE];
> - calldata->arg.fmode = FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE;
> spin_lock(&state->owner->so_lock);
> + is_rdwr = test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
> + is_rdonly = test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
> + is_wronly = test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
> + spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
> + /* Calculate the current open share mode */
> + calldata->arg.fmode = 0;
> + if (is_rdonly || is_rdwr)
> + calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ;
> + if (is_wronly || is_rdwr)
> + calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE;
> /* Calculate the change in open mode */
> if (state->n_rdwr == 0) {
Do we need the owner lock for reading state->n_rdwr, n_rdonly, and n_wronly?
Anna
> if (state->n_rdonly == 0) {
> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
> + call_close |= is_rdonly || is_rdwr;
> calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_READ;
> }
> if (state->n_wronly == 0) {
> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
> + call_close |= is_wronly || is_rdwr;
> calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_WRITE;
> }
> }
> if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state))
> call_close = 0;
> - spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
>
> if (!call_close) {
> /* Note: exit _without_ calling nfs4_close_done */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation
2014-08-26 20:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation Anna Schumaker
@ 2014-08-26 20:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-08-26 20:21 ` Anna Schumaker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2014-08-26 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anna Schumaker; +Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List, James Drews, jrs
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Anna Schumaker
<Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
> On 08/26/2014 02:30 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> In the presence of delegations, we can no longer assume that the
>> state->n_rdwr, state->n_rdonly, state->n_wronly reflect the open
>> stateid share mode, and so we need to need to calculate the initial
> Nit: Remove the duplicate "need to" (above).
>
>> value for calldata->arg.fmode using the state->flags.
>>
>> Reported-by: James Drews <drews@engr.wisc.edu>
>> Fixes: 88069f77e1ac5 (NFSv41: Fix a potential state leakage when...)
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
>> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> index 75ae8d22f067..7d67d5b332d4 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> @@ -2601,6 +2601,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
>> struct nfs4_closedata *calldata = data;
>> struct nfs4_state *state = calldata->state;
>> struct inode *inode = calldata->inode;
>> + bool is_rdonly, is_wronly, is_rdwr;
>> int call_close = 0;
>>
>> dprintk("%s: begin!\n", __func__);
>> @@ -2608,24 +2609,30 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
>> goto out_wait;
>>
>> task->tk_msg.rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_OPEN_DOWNGRADE];
>> - calldata->arg.fmode = FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE;
>> spin_lock(&state->owner->so_lock);
>> + is_rdwr = test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
>> + is_rdonly = test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>> + is_wronly = test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>> + spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
>> + /* Calculate the current open share mode */
>> + calldata->arg.fmode = 0;
>> + if (is_rdonly || is_rdwr)
>> + calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ;
>> + if (is_wronly || is_rdwr)
>> + calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE;
>> /* Calculate the change in open mode */
>> if (state->n_rdwr == 0) {
> Do we need the owner lock for reading state->n_rdwr, n_rdonly, and n_wronly?
Duh, yes, you're right. I'll revert that part of the change.
> Anna
>> if (state->n_rdonly == 0) {
>> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
>> + call_close |= is_rdonly || is_rdwr;
>> calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_READ;
>> }
>> if (state->n_wronly == 0) {
>> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
>> + call_close |= is_wronly || is_rdwr;
>> calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_WRITE;
>> }
>> }
>> if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state))
>> call_close = 0;
>> - spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
>>
>> if (!call_close) {
>> /* Note: exit _without_ calling nfs4_close_done */
>
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
trond.myklebust@primarydata.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation
2014-08-26 20:15 ` Trond Myklebust
@ 2014-08-26 20:21 ` Anna Schumaker
[not found] ` <OFAD58A859.9600390A-ON88257D40.0070BE69-88257D40.0070FF36@LocalDomain>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anna Schumaker @ 2014-08-26 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List, James Drews, jrs
On 08/26/2014 04:15 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Anna Schumaker
> <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
>> On 08/26/2014 02:30 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>> In the presence of delegations, we can no longer assume that the
>>> state->n_rdwr, state->n_rdonly, state->n_wronly reflect the open
>>> stateid share mode, and so we need to need to calculate the initial
>> Nit: Remove the duplicate "need to" (above).
>>
>>> value for calldata->arg.fmode using the state->flags.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: James Drews <drews@engr.wisc.edu>
>>> Fixes: 88069f77e1ac5 (NFSv41: Fix a potential state leakage when...)
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
>>> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>>> index 75ae8d22f067..7d67d5b332d4 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>>> @@ -2601,6 +2601,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
>>> struct nfs4_closedata *calldata = data;
>>> struct nfs4_state *state = calldata->state;
>>> struct inode *inode = calldata->inode;
>>> + bool is_rdonly, is_wronly, is_rdwr;
>>> int call_close = 0;
>>>
>>> dprintk("%s: begin!\n", __func__);
>>> @@ -2608,24 +2609,30 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
>>> goto out_wait;
>>>
>>> task->tk_msg.rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_OPEN_DOWNGRADE];
>>> - calldata->arg.fmode = FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE;
>>> spin_lock(&state->owner->so_lock);
>>> + is_rdwr = test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
>>> + is_rdonly = test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>>> + is_wronly = test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>>> + spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
>>> + /* Calculate the current open share mode */
>>> + calldata->arg.fmode = 0;
>>> + if (is_rdonly || is_rdwr)
>>> + calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ;
>>> + if (is_wronly || is_rdwr)
>>> + calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE;
>>> /* Calculate the change in open mode */
>>> if (state->n_rdwr == 0) {
>> Do we need the owner lock for reading state->n_rdwr, n_rdonly, and n_wronly?
>
> Duh, yes, you're right. I'll revert that part of the change.
I could be wrong! I checked for other uses, and nfs4proc.c:can_open_cached() reads these values without a lock.
Anna
>
>> Anna
>>> if (state->n_rdonly == 0) {
>>> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>>> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
>>> + call_close |= is_rdonly || is_rdwr;
>>> calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_READ;
>>> }
>>> if (state->n_wronly == 0) {
>>> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>>> - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
>>> + call_close |= is_wronly || is_rdwr;
>>> calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_WRITE;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state))
>>> call_close = 0;
>>> - spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
>>>
>>> if (!call_close) {
>>> /* Note: exit _without_ calling nfs4_close_done */
>>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: NFSv4.2 Linux client
[not found] ` <OFAD58A859.9600390A-ON88257D40.0070BE69-88257D40.0070FF36@LocalDomain>
@ 2014-08-26 22:43 ` Marc Eshel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marc Eshel @ 2014-08-26 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Eshel; +Cc: Anna Schumaker, Linux NFS Mailing List, Trond Myklebust
Hi Anna,
Any plans to update the Linux client with the latest changes to the
NFSv4.2 draft?
Marc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-26 22:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-26 18:30 [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation Trond Myklebust
2014-08-26 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] NFSv4: Don't clear the open state when we just did an OPEN_DOWNGRADE Trond Myklebust
2014-08-26 20:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation Anna Schumaker
2014-08-26 20:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-08-26 20:21 ` Anna Schumaker
[not found] ` <OFAD58A859.9600390A-ON88257D40.0070BE69-88257D40.0070FF36@LocalDomain>
2014-08-26 22:43 ` NFSv4.2 Linux client Marc Eshel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox