From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 14/17] locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:38:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409834323-7171-15-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409834323-7171-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com>
Eliminate an unneeded "flock" variable. We can use "fl" as a loop cursor
everywhere. Add a any_leases_conflict helper function as well to
consolidate a bit of code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
---
fs/locks.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 011812490c92..246ba53650f7 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -1351,6 +1351,20 @@ static bool leases_conflict(struct file_lock *lease, struct file_lock *breaker)
return locks_conflict(breaker, lease);
}
+static bool
+any_leases_conflict(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *breaker)
+{
+ struct file_lock *fl;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&inode->i_lock);
+
+ for (fl = inode->i_flock ; fl && IS_LEASE(fl); fl = fl->fl_next) {
+ if (leases_conflict(fl, breaker))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
/**
* __break_lease - revoke all outstanding leases on file
* @inode: the inode of the file to return
@@ -1367,10 +1381,9 @@ static bool leases_conflict(struct file_lock *lease, struct file_lock *breaker)
int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type)
{
int error = 0;
- struct file_lock *new_fl, *flock;
+ struct file_lock *new_fl;
struct file_lock *fl;
unsigned long break_time;
- bool lease_conflict = false;
int want_write = (mode & O_ACCMODE) != O_RDONLY;
LIST_HEAD(dispose);
@@ -1383,17 +1396,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type)
time_out_leases(inode, &dispose);
- flock = inode->i_flock;
- if ((flock == NULL) || !IS_LEASE(flock))
- goto out;
-
- for (fl = flock; fl && IS_LEASE(fl); fl = fl->fl_next) {
- if (leases_conflict(fl, new_fl)) {
- lease_conflict = true;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (!lease_conflict)
+ if (!any_leases_conflict(inode, new_fl))
goto out;
break_time = 0;
@@ -1403,7 +1406,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type)
break_time++; /* so that 0 means no break time */
}
- for (fl = flock; fl && IS_LEASE(fl); fl = fl->fl_next) {
+ for (fl = inode->i_flock; fl && IS_LEASE(fl); fl = fl->fl_next) {
if (!leases_conflict(fl, new_fl))
continue;
if (want_write) {
@@ -1412,7 +1415,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type)
fl->fl_flags |= FL_UNLOCK_PENDING;
fl->fl_break_time = break_time;
} else {
- if (lease_breaking(flock))
+ if (lease_breaking(inode->i_flock))
continue;
fl->fl_flags |= FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING;
fl->fl_downgrade_time = break_time;
@@ -1427,12 +1430,12 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type)
}
restart:
- break_time = flock->fl_break_time;
+ break_time = inode->i_flock->fl_break_time;
if (break_time != 0)
break_time -= jiffies;
if (break_time == 0)
break_time++;
- locks_insert_block(flock, new_fl);
+ locks_insert_block(inode->i_flock, new_fl);
trace_break_lease_block(inode, new_fl);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
locks_dispose_list(&dispose);
@@ -1442,17 +1445,15 @@ restart:
trace_break_lease_unblock(inode, new_fl);
locks_delete_block(new_fl);
if (error >= 0) {
- if (error == 0)
- time_out_leases(inode, &dispose);
/*
* Wait for the next conflicting lease that has not been
* broken yet
*/
- for (flock = inode->i_flock; flock && IS_LEASE(flock);
- flock = flock->fl_next) {
- if (leases_conflict(new_fl, flock))
- goto restart;
- }
+ if (error == 0)
+ time_out_leases(inode, &dispose);
+ if (any_leases_conflict(inode, new_fl))
+ goto restart;
+
error = 0;
}
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-04 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-04 12:38 [PATCH v2 00/17] locks: internal lease API overhaul Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] locks: consolidate "nolease" routines Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-09-04 12:49 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 18:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-09-04 20:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 11:48 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] security: make security_file_set_fowner, f_setown and __f_setown void return Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-07 17:11 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-10-07 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-07 17:34 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-10-07 18:02 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] locks: close potential race in lease_get_mtime Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] nfsd: fix potential lease memory leak in nfs4_setlease Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] locks: generic_delete_lease doesn't need a file_lock at all Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 20:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 0:29 ` Jeff Layton
2015-01-12 23:03 ` NeilBrown
2015-01-12 23:25 ` Jeff Layton
2015-01-13 2:14 ` NeilBrown
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] locks: clean up vfs_setlease kerneldoc comments Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] nfsd: don't keep a pointer to the lease in nfs4_file Jeff Layton
2014-09-05 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-09-06 12:33 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] locks: plumb a "priv" pointer into the setlease routines Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] locks: move i_lock acquisition into generic_*_lease handlers Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 14:03 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] locks: update Documentation/filesystems with new setlease semantics Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 14:02 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] locks: remove i_have_this_lease check from __break_lease Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 18:03 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-09-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 13:35 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] locks: give lm_break a return value Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 18:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] locks: set fl_owner for leases to filp instead of current->files Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] locks: clean up comments over fl_owner_t definition Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 13:36 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409834323-7171-15-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com \
--to=jlayton@primarydata.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox