From: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] nfsd: don't keep a pointer to the lease in nfs4_file
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 08:33:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140906083303.6b79a775@tlielax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140905214058.GA5443@fieldses.org>
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:40:58 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:38:33AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Now that we don't need to pass in an actual lease pointer to
> > vfs_setlease on unlock, we can stop tracking a pointer to the lease in
> > the nfs4_file.
> >
> > Switch all of the places that check the fi_lease to check fi_deleg_file
> > instead. We always set that at the same time so it will have the same
> > semantics.
> >
> > Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 10 ++++------
> > fs/nfsd/state.h | 1 -
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 0cd252916e1a..d0a6e8e022a2 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -680,11 +680,10 @@ static void nfs4_put_deleg_lease(struct nfs4_file *fp)
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_held(&state_lock);
> >
> > - if (!fp->fi_lease)
> > + if (!fp->fi_deleg_file)
> > return;
> > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fp->fi_delegees)) {
> > vfs_setlease(fp->fi_deleg_file, F_UNLCK, NULL);
> > - fp->fi_lease = NULL;
> > fput(fp->fi_deleg_file);
> > fp->fi_deleg_file = NULL;
> > }
>
> Note the code in my for-3.18 branch is different here due to a couple
> patches I've already taken from you.
>
> --b.
>
Doh! Yes, I'll make sure to pull those into the topic branch where I'm
working on these and rebase on top of them. Thanks!
> > @@ -3061,8 +3060,8 @@ static void nfsd4_init_file(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct knfsd_fh *fh)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_stateids);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_delegations);
> > fh_copy_shallow(&fp->fi_fhandle, fh);
> > + fp->fi_deleg_file = NULL;
> > fp->fi_had_conflict = false;
> > - fp->fi_lease = NULL;
> > fp->fi_share_deny = 0;
> > memset(fp->fi_fds, 0, sizeof(fp->fi_fds));
> > memset(fp->fi_access, 0, sizeof(fp->fi_access));
> > @@ -3803,13 +3802,12 @@ static int nfs4_setlease(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> > if (fp->fi_had_conflict)
> > goto out_unlock;
> > /* Race breaker */
> > - if (fp->fi_lease) {
> > + if (fp->fi_deleg_file) {
> > status = 0;
> > atomic_inc(&fp->fi_delegees);
> > hash_delegation_locked(dp, fp);
> > goto out_unlock;
> > }
> > - fp->fi_lease = fl;
> > fp->fi_deleg_file = filp;
> > atomic_set(&fp->fi_delegees, 1);
> > hash_delegation_locked(dp, fp);
> > @@ -3842,7 +3840,7 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct svc_fh *fh,
> > spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
> > dp->dl_stid.sc_file = fp;
> > - if (!fp->fi_lease) {
> > + if (!fp->fi_deleg_file) {
> > spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> > spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > status = nfs4_setlease(dp);
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> > index 4a89e00d7461..64f291a25a8c 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> > @@ -477,7 +477,6 @@ struct nfs4_file {
> > atomic_t fi_access[2];
> > u32 fi_share_deny;
> > struct file *fi_deleg_file;
> > - struct file_lock *fi_lease;
> > atomic_t fi_delegees;
> > struct knfsd_fh fi_fhandle;
> > bool fi_had_conflict;
> > --
> > 1.9.3
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-06 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-04 12:38 [PATCH v2 00/17] locks: internal lease API overhaul Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] locks: consolidate "nolease" routines Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-09-04 12:49 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 18:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-09-04 20:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 11:48 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] security: make security_file_set_fowner, f_setown and __f_setown void return Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-07 17:11 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-10-07 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-07 17:34 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-10-07 18:02 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] locks: close potential race in lease_get_mtime Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] nfsd: fix potential lease memory leak in nfs4_setlease Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] locks: generic_delete_lease doesn't need a file_lock at all Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 20:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 0:29 ` Jeff Layton
2015-01-12 23:03 ` NeilBrown
2015-01-12 23:25 ` Jeff Layton
2015-01-13 2:14 ` NeilBrown
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] locks: clean up vfs_setlease kerneldoc comments Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] nfsd: don't keep a pointer to the lease in nfs4_file Jeff Layton
2014-09-05 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-09-06 12:33 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] locks: plumb a "priv" pointer into the setlease routines Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] locks: move i_lock acquisition into generic_*_lease handlers Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 14:03 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] locks: update Documentation/filesystems with new setlease semantics Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 14:02 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] locks: remove i_have_this_lease check from __break_lease Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 18:03 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 18:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 13:35 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] locks: give lm_break a return value Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 18:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] locks: set fl_owner for leases to filp instead of current->files Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] locks: clean up comments over fl_owner_t definition Jeff Layton
2014-09-04 17:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 13:36 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140906083303.6b79a775@tlielax.poochiereds.net \
--to=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox