* [PATCH RFC] nfsd: don't revoke delegations that a client has stated it doesn't have
@ 2015-10-15 16:09 Andrew Elble
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Elble @ 2015-10-15 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs; +Cc: Andrew Elble
Assuming a client has lost a delegation: If the server goes to recall
the delegation, an attempt is made to recall it twice separated by
a delay of 2 seconds. Both times, the client will state that it
doesn't have the delegation via -EBADHANDLE or -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
1.) Any race between a delegation grant and a recall has been
presumably avoided by the delay and second attempt.
2.) The client doesn't have the delegation.
3.) The backchannel is responsive.
After these two attempts fail, the laundromat will eventually revoke
them and add these delegations to cl_revoked. This results in another
attempt to get the client to return the delegation via
TEST/FREE STATEID. This will also fail with no means
of resolution, and will cause the server and client to loop
indefinitely, as the client has nothing to give the server to satisfy it.
The changes here are to establish a safe way to recover by:
If the client has responded with -EBADHANDLE or -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID:
1.) Not failing the backchannel after two attempts at a recall.
2.) At the time revocation would normally occur: destroying the
delegation on the server side.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Elble <aweits@rit.edu>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index da21df673ed9..34d928bd847d 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -3578,7 +3578,7 @@ static int nfsd4_cb_recall_done(struct nfsd4_callback *cb,
rpc_delay(task, 2 * HZ);
return 0;
}
- /*FALLTHRU*/
+ return 1;
default:
return -1;
}
@@ -4450,8 +4450,16 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
dp = list_first_entry(&reaplist, struct nfs4_delegation,
dl_recall_lru);
- list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
- revoke_delegation(dp);
+ if ((dp->dl_recall.cb_status == -EBADHANDLE) ||
+ (dp->dl_recall.cb_status == -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID)) {
+ dprintk("nfsd: client: %.*s is losing delegations",
+ (int)dp->dl_recall.cb_clp->cl_name.len,
+ dp->dl_recall.cb_clp->cl_name.data);
+ destroy_delegation(dp);
+ } else {
+ list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
+ revoke_delegation(dp);
+ }
}
spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
--
2.4.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-10-15 16:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-15 16:09 [PATCH RFC] nfsd: don't revoke delegations that a client has stated it doesn't have Andrew Elble
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox