From: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] nfsd4: fix gss-proxy 4.1 mounts for some AD principals
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:05:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448388306.29102.2.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448385497-23737-6-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 12:18 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
>
> The principal name on a gss cred is used to setup the NFSv4.0 callback,
> which has to have a client principal name to authenticate to.
>
> That code wants the name to be in the form servicetype@hostname.
> rpc.svcgssd passes down such names (and passes down no principal name at
> all in the case the principal isn't a service principal).
>
> gss-proxy always passes down the principal name, and passes it down in
> the form servicetype/hostname@REALM. So we've been munging the name
> gss-proxy passes down into the format the NFSv4.0 callback code expects,
> or throwing away the name if we can't.
>
> Since the introduction of the MACH_CRED enforcement in NFSv4.1, we've
> also been using the principal name to verify that certain operations are
> done as the same principal as was used on the original EXCHANGE_ID call.
>
> For that application, the original name passed down by gss-proxy is also
> useful.
>
> Lack of that name in some cases was causing some kerberized NFSv4.1
> mount failures in an Active Directory environment.
>
> This fix only works in the gss-proxy case. The fix for legacy
> rpc.svcgssd would be more involved, and rpc.svcgssd already has other
> problems in the AD case.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: James Ralston <ralston@pobox.com>
> Cc: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
LGTM, feel free to add ack by me.
> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 10 +++++++++-
> include/linux/sunrpc/svcauth.h | 9 ++++++++-
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_rpc_upcall.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 36ad22a15d61..0e685201f0db 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -1875,6 +1875,10 @@ static int copy_cred(struct svc_cred *target, struct svc_cred *source)
> ret = strdup_if_nonnull(&target->cr_principal, source->cr_principal);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> + ret = strdup_if_nonnull(&target->cr_raw_principal,
> + source->cr_raw_principal);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> target->cr_flavor = source->cr_flavor;
> target->cr_uid = source->cr_uid;
> target->cr_gid = source->cr_gid;
> @@ -1978,6 +1982,9 @@ static bool mach_creds_match(struct nfs4_client *cl, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> return false;
> if (!svc_rqst_integrity_protected(rqstp))
> return false;
> + if (cl->cl_cred.cr_raw_principal)
> + return 0 == strcmp(cl->cl_cred.cr_raw_principal,
> + cr->cr_raw_principal);
> if (!cr->cr_principal)
> return false;
> return 0 == strcmp(cl->cl_cred.cr_principal, cr->cr_principal);
> @@ -2389,7 +2396,8 @@ nfsd4_exchange_id(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> * Which is a bug, really. Anyway, we can't enforce
> * MACH_CRED in that case, better to give up now:
> */
> - if (!new->cl_cred.cr_principal) {
> + if (!new->cl_cred.cr_principal &&
> + !new->cl_cred.cr_raw_principal) {
> status = nfserr_serverfault;
> goto out_nolock;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcauth.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcauth.h
> index 8d71d6577459..c00f53a4ccdd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcauth.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcauth.h
> @@ -23,13 +23,19 @@ struct svc_cred {
> kgid_t cr_gid;
> struct group_info *cr_group_info;
> u32 cr_flavor; /* pseudoflavor */
> - char *cr_principal; /* for gss */
> + /* name of form servicetype/hostname@REALM, passed down by
> + * gss-proxy: */
> + char *cr_raw_principal;
> + /* name of form servicetype@hostname, passed down by
> + * rpc.svcgssd, or computed from the above: */
> + char *cr_principal;
> struct gss_api_mech *cr_gss_mech;
> };
>
> static inline void init_svc_cred(struct svc_cred *cred)
> {
> cred->cr_group_info = NULL;
> + cred->cr_raw_principal = NULL;
> cred->cr_principal = NULL;
> cred->cr_gss_mech = NULL;
> }
> @@ -38,6 +44,7 @@ static inline void free_svc_cred(struct svc_cred *cred)
> {
> if (cred->cr_group_info)
> put_group_info(cred->cr_group_info);
> + kfree(cred->cr_raw_principal);
> kfree(cred->cr_principal);
> gss_mech_put(cred->cr_gss_mech);
> init_svc_cred(cred);
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_rpc_upcall.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_rpc_upcall.c
> index 59eeed43eda2..f0c6a8c78a56 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_rpc_upcall.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_rpc_upcall.c
> @@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ int gssp_accept_sec_context_upcall(struct net *net,
> if (data->found_creds && client_name.data != NULL) {
> char *c;
>
> + data->creds.cr_raw_principal = kstrndup(client_name.data,
> + client_name.len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> data->creds.cr_principal = kstrndup(client_name.data,
> client_name.len, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (data->creds.cr_principal) {
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-24 17:18 [PATCH 0/5] fix nfs server handling of principal names J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] svcrpc: move some initialization to common code J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] nfsd: helper for dup of possibly NULL string J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] nfsd: minor consolidation of mach_cred handling code J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] nfsd: fix unlikely NULL deref in mach_creds_match J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] nfsd4: fix gss-proxy 4.1 mounts for some AD principals J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-24 18:05 ` Simo Sorce [this message]
2015-11-24 18:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448388306.29102.2.camel@redhat.com \
--to=simo@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox