Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Does Postmark correctly model email workloads
@ 2004-03-19  4:14 Yusuf Goolamabbas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Yusuf Goolamabbas @ 2004-03-19  4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nfs

Looking at the source of Postmark, I don't see any fsync/O_SYNC calls. 
MTA's are very fsync intensive. As such, I am not sure if Postmark
correctly models email-intensive workloads or have I missed something
obvious ?

Paper/source on Postmark available here

http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3022.print

Charles, any comments ? 

Regards, Yusuf


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-03-19  4:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-19  4:14 Does Postmark correctly model email workloads Yusuf Goolamabbas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox