Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, pnfs mailing list <pnfs@linux-nfs.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [pnfs] [PATCH] nfsd: use nfs client rpc callback program
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:21:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080924172134.GI5772@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1222275582.7390.8.camel@localhost>

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:59:42PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 12:35 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:24:39PM -0500, Benny Halevy wrote:
> > > From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
> > > 
> > > since commit ff7d9756b501744540be65e172d27ee321d86103
> > > "nfsd: use static memory for callback program and stats"
> > > do_probe_callback uses a static callback program
> > > (NFS4_CALLBACK) rather than the one set in clp->cl_callback.cb_prog
> > > as passed in by the client in setclientid (4.0)
> > > or create_session (4.1).
> > > 
> > > This patches allows allocating cb_program (and cb_stats) dynamically
> > > and setting a free_rpc_program function pointer to be
> > > called when the rpc_clnt structure is destroyed.
> > 
> > So that means we handle two cases:
> > 
> > 	- free_rpc_program = NULL: We assume the program and stats are
> > 	  in static memory (or module memory--which might be a problem
> > 	  if we shut down the server and remove the nfsd module in quick
> > 	  succession.  I assume there's a similar (probably very
> > 	  hard-to-hit) bug on the client too, but haven't looked
> > 	  carefully.).
> > 	- free_rpc_program != NULL: We assume this rpc_client is the
> > 	  last user of the program.
> > 
> > It seems a little ad hoc, but I can't see why it wouldn't solve the
> > problem.
> > 
> > I'd want Trond's ack.
> 
> Well the current implementation is certainly broken.  Look at what
> happens if I clone the rpc_clnt...

Hence the comment that "we assume this rpc_client is the last user of
the program."  I believe that assumption is correct in the case of nfsd
callbacks, so Benny's patch is at least not broken--just a little
ad-hoc.

So the question is whether the above solution, which addresses only this
particular case, is sufficient, or whether we'd like something more
general, like adding a reference count to the program along with a
free_program callback called only on the final put.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-24 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-17 19:43 [PATCH] nfsd: use nfs client rpc callback program Benny Halevy
2008-09-17 23:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-17 23:34   ` Benny Halevy
2008-09-18  0:10     ` [pnfs] " Benny Halevy
2008-09-18 19:24       ` Benny Halevy
2008-09-18 19:43         ` Peter Staubach
2008-09-18 20:05           ` Benny Halevy
2008-09-18 21:36             ` Benny Halevy
2008-09-24 16:35         ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-24 16:59           ` Trond Myklebust
2008-09-24 17:21             ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-09-24 17:26               ` Trond Myklebust
2008-09-24 17:42                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-24 18:42                   ` Trond Myklebust
2008-09-24 18:49                     ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-25 19:30                       ` Benny Halevy
2008-09-25 20:00                         ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-25 20:27                           ` Trond Myklebust
2008-09-25 20:41                             ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-26 11:52                               ` Benny Halevy
2008-09-27  3:34                                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-28  6:21                                   ` [PATCH v4] " Benny Halevy
2008-09-29 19:21                                     ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-25 20:08                         ` [pnfs] [PATCH] " Trond Myklebust
2008-09-25 20:38                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-19 19:51     ` Olga Kornievskaia
2008-09-19 21:15       ` Benny Halevy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080924172134.GI5772@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=aglo@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pnfs@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=trond@netapp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox