Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com>
Cc: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>,
	andros@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFSD EOS deferral
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:06:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081020180637.GB23927@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDarcR4000001cd-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:51:00PM -0400, Talpey, Thomas wrote:
> At 04:36 PM 10/17/2008, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:26:18PM -0400, Talpey, Thomas wrote:
> >> At 02:59 PM 10/17/2008, Marc Eshel wrote:
> >> >linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org wrote on 10/17/2008 10:44:54 AM:
> >> >
> >> >> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> 
> >> >> Requests longer than a page are still not deferred, so large writes that
> >> >> trigger upcalls still get an ERR_DELAY.  OK, probably no big deal.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I don't think we can apply this until we have some way to track the
> >> >> number and size of deferred requests outstanding and fall back on
> >> >> ERR_DELAY if it's too much.
> >> >
> >> >But I thought that the problem here is that the Linux NFS client doesn't 
> >> >handle this return code properly.
> >> 
> >> Definitely this is an issue. Early clients do one of two things, they either
> >> pass the error back to the application, or they enter a buzz loop resending
> >> the operation with no delay. Later clients back off, but for a constant
> >> five seconds.
> >
> >I haven't tested it, but from fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:nfs4_delay() it appears
> >to start at a tenth of a second and then do exponential backoff (up to
> >15 seconds).  Looks to me like the code's been that way since at least
> >2.6.19.
> 
> I was referring to NFSv3, actually - also impacted by this codepath.

OK, sorry.

Hm, taking another look: nfs3_rpc_wrapper() uses a constant 5 second
delay, and nfs4_async_handle_error() uses a constant 15 second delay, so
it's only nfs4_handle_exception that does the exponential backoff.
Maybe we could fix that.

--b.

> But I'll take the opportunity to point out that we'll get 5 retries from
> an NFSv4 client before 2 seconds go by, and only one from NFSv3
> in twice that. In either case, it's a heck of a bad trade to return "I'm
> busy" only to have your bell rung repeatedly in response.
> 
> Sorry, I have always hated EJUKEBOX.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-20 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-15 21:00 [PATCH 0/3] NFSD EOS deferral andros
2008-10-15 21:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC add deferral processing callbacks andros
2008-10-15 21:00   ` [PATCH 2/3] NFSD save, restore, and release deferred result pages andros
2008-10-15 21:00     ` [PATCH 3/3] NFSD deferral processing andros
2008-10-17 20:46       ` Talpey, Thomas
     [not found]         ` <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDNY30k000001cc-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-20 17:58           ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-17 17:48   ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC add deferral processing callbacks J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-17 18:42     ` Andy Adamson
2008-10-17 20:35   ` Talpey, Thomas
     [not found]     ` <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDf3sll000001cb-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-20 18:42       ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-17 17:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] NFSD EOS deferral J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-17 18:44   ` Andy Adamson
2008-10-17 18:59   ` Marc Eshel
     [not found]     ` <OF9E4C4BA6.37418EC7-ON882574E5.0067FB2B-882574E5.0068487F@ us.ibm.com>
2008-10-17 20:26       ` Talpey, Thomas
     [not found]         ` <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDidcDj000001ca-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-17 20:36           ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-17 20:51             ` Talpey, Thomas
     [not found]               ` <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDarcR4000001cd-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-20 18:06                 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-22 18:12 andros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081020180637.GB23927@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com \
    --cc=andros@netapp.com \
    --cc=eshel@almaden.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox