From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen-pxSi+dnQzZMxHbG02/KK1g@public.gmane.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
bfields@fieldses.org, trond@netapp.com,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c: some common code found
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:00:53 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090207.190053.127196059.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234027321.17241.25.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:22:01 -0500
> My point is that the process for accepting patches into the kernel
> involves ensuring that there is consensus.
You haven't been hacking the kernel very long if you actually
believe this.
When people are being rediculious or unreasonable, subsystem
or higher maintainers make exective decisions all the time.
"revert based upon principle" ?!?! If you think Linus will do that
for a correct change, you're kidding yourself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-08 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902062247500.31842@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902062251501.31842@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
[not found] ` <20090206212043.GA1216@fieldses.org>
[not found] ` <20090206.140714.201930500.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <CAF18546-B024-40C9-8276-8FCD89C98E72@oracle.com>
2009-02-06 22:58 ` [PATCH] net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c: some common code found Ilpo Järvinen
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902070040530.31875-x/A8LOkYjdVsRR2hCrRKtT03IgOmwywn@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-07 3:22 ` David Miller
2009-02-07 16:23 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1234023804.17241.14.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-07 16:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-02-07 17:22 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1234027321.17241.25.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-08 3:00 ` David Miller [this message]
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902071831210.2805-x/A8LOkYjdVsRR2hCrRKtT03IgOmwywn@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-08 5:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-02-09 17:29 ` Chuck Lever
2009-02-10 13:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902101417550.31742-x/A8LOkYjdVsRR2hCrRKtT03IgOmwywn@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-10 17:12 ` Chuck Lever
2009-02-10 13:20 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-02-10 22:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090207.190053.127196059.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen-pxSi+dnQzZMxHbG02/KK1g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trond@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox