From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
pNFS Mailing List <pnfs@linux-nfs.org>
Subject: Re: [pnfs] [PATCHSET 00/12 repost] nfsd: #includes cleanup
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:01:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091203190106.GB3317@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B18054F.3080902@panasas.com>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:37:03PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 12/03/2009 08:26 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bruce
> >
> > I'm reposting the all set together
> >
> > There are two patches that people have said will go through
> > other trees (see below). So either wait with patch 12/12 after
> > they get into Linus. Or also submit them through nfsd, it should
> > not cause any problems to post the same patch from two sub-trees,
> > right?
> >
> > (For the things done here please let it sit in linux-next for
> > a couple of nights)
> >
>
> Bruce, these are based on for-2.6.33 branch from your tree
> but I just realize that your "-next" branch is more advanced
>
> Must I rebase? (But only Sunday it's getting late down here)
No, for-2.6.33 is the right one to work against. Thanks!
(I'm keeping two main branches with pending patches:
for-2.6.x: this is stuff I've committed. I never rewind/rebase
this branch. This is almost always the branch to work against.
for-2.6.x-next: this everything in for-2.6.x, plus stuff I'm
expecting to commit soon, but may be waiting for review or may
still need minor tweaks. I may rewind this branch. I wouldn't
recommend working against it. This is the branch that's pulled
into linux-next.
)
--b.
>
> Boaz
> > [PATCH 01/12] nfsd: Remove nfsfh.h dependency on sunrpc
> > [PATCH 02/12] sunrpc: Clean never used include files
> > [PATCH 03/12] nfsd: Fix independence of a few nfsd related headers
> > [PATCH 04/12] nfsd: Headers Independence and include cleanups
> > [PATCH 05/12] nfsd: Source files #include cleanups
> >
> > First batch
> >
> > [PATCH 06/12] compat.c: Remove dependence on nfsd private headers
> > [PATCH 07/12] parsic: remove un-used nfsd #includes
> >
> > This patch we have ACK on
> >
> > [PATCH 08/12] sparc: remove un-used nfsd #includes
> > [PATCH 09/12] s390: remove un-used nfsd #includes
> >
> > These two were reported as submitted into ARCH tree for 2.6.33
> >
> > [PATCH 10/12] lockd: Remove un-used nfsd headers #includes
> > [PATCH 11/12] vfs: nfsctl.c un-used nfsd #includes
> >
> > [PATCH 12/12] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory
> >
> > this patch is the only one that depends on all
> > the other parts, and need all patches in.
> > (And will cause Benny's tree to adjust)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Boaz
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pNFS mailing list
> > pNFS@linux-nfs.org
> > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-03 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-03 18:26 [PATCHSET 00/12 repost] nfsd: #includes cleanup Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:28 ` [PATCH 01/12] nfsd: Remove nfsfh.h dependency on sunrpc Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-05 1:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-03 18:28 ` [PATCH 02/12] sunrpc: Clean never used include files Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:28 ` [PATCH 03/12] nfsd: Fix independence of a few nfsd related headers Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:28 ` [PATCH 04/12] nfsd: Headers Independence and include cleanups Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:29 ` [PATCH 05/12] nfsd: Source files #include cleanups Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:29 ` [PATCH 06/12] compat.c: Remove dependence on nfsd private headers Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:29 ` [PATCH 07/12] parsic: remove un-used nfsd #includes Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:29 ` [PATCH 08/12] sparc: " Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:30 ` [PATCH 09/12] s390: " Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:30 ` [PATCH 10/12] lockd: Remove un-used nfsd headers #includes Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:30 ` [PATCH 11/12] vfs: nfsctl.c un-used nfsd #includes Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:30 ` [PATCH 12/12] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 18:37 ` [pnfs] [PATCHSET 00/12 repost] nfsd: #includes cleanup Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 19:01 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-12-05 1:00 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-05 1:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-05 1:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-06 9:36 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091203190106.GB3317@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pnfs@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox