Re: [PATCHSET 00/12 repost] nfsd: #includes cleanup

["J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>]

On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:26:24PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> 
> Hi Bruce
> 
> I'm reposting the all set together

Applied locally (but pushed to branch for linux-next), thanks.

--b.

> 
> There are two patches that people have said will go through
> other trees (see below). So either wait with patch 12/12 after
> they get into Linus. Or also submit them through nfsd, it should
> not cause any problems to post the same patch from two sub-trees,
> right?
> 
> (For the things done here please let it sit in linux-next for
>  a couple of nights)
> 
> [PATCH 01/12] nfsd: Remove nfsfh.h dependency on sunrpc
> [PATCH 02/12] sunrpc: Clean never used include files   
> [PATCH 03/12] nfsd: Fix independence of a few nfsd related headers
> [PATCH 04/12] nfsd: Headers Independence and include cleanups     
> [PATCH 05/12] nfsd: Source files #include cleanups
> 
> 	First batch
> 
> [PATCH 06/12] compat.c: Remove dependence on nfsd private headers
> [PATCH 07/12] parsic: remove un-used nfsd #includes
> 
> 	This patch we have ACK on
> 
> [PATCH 08/12] sparc: remove un-used nfsd #includes
> [PATCH 09/12] s390: remove un-used nfsd #includes
> 
> 	These two were reported as submitted into ARCH tree for 2.6.33
> 
> [PATCH 10/12] lockd: Remove un-used nfsd headers #includes
> [PATCH 11/12] vfs: nfsctl.c un-used nfsd #includes
> 
> [PATCH 12/12] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory
> 	
> 	this patch is the only one that depends on all
> 	the other parts, and need all patches in.
> 	(And will cause Benny's tree to adjust)
> 
> Thanks
> Boaz
>