Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd4: complete enforcement of 4.1 op ordering

["J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>]

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 07:44:51PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
> On Apr. 27, 2010, 19:34 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
> > The main lists we've been using are:
> > 
> > 	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> > 	    nfsv4@linux-nfs.org
> > 	     pnfs@linux-nfs.org
> > 
> > This seems to be confusing.  We've talked before about transitioning
> > away from one (probably nfsv4@linux-nfs.org).  Maybe now's the time to
> > start.
> 
> I'm all for it.
> Maybe it's time to fold the pnfs list into linux-nfs too.

So, looking back at what we did for the sourceforge list:

	- We added something to the footer saying the list is
	  deprecated.  (But if we wanted to be more obnoxious, we could
	  add it to the top of each message.)

	- We subscribed the new list (linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org) to the
	  old list, I guess so newbie bug reports sent to the old list
	  wouldn't get lost.

Anyone want to object to starting that process for nfsv4@linux-nfs.org?
What about pnfs@linux-nfs.org?

--b.