From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, postmaster@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd4: complete enforcement of 4.1 op ordering
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:22:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD70F5F.7080409@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100427161244.GG30729@fieldses.org>
On Apr. 27, 2010, 19:12 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:46:43PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> On Apr. 27, 2010, 18:01 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:40:53PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>>>> Bruce, Oddly enough I didn't receive the patch you're commenting on into
>>>> my inbox. It already happened before on this list and I've no idea what
>>>> could have went wrong. (I also have a gmail account subscribed on this list
>>>> and I can't find it there, even in the spam folder :-/)
>>>
>>> Huh. I see it in various archives, so I'll assume the problem's on your
>>> end.
>>>
>>
>> I see it on the archives too, but since I don't ever erase anything out
>> of my gmail lists account the fact that it's not there AND not
>> on my panasas account as well is really suspicious. I wonder if
>> vger had some sort of outage or glitch that could explain that.
>
> For what it's worth I've found postmaster at vger.kernel.org can
> sometimes help troubleshoot problems.
>
> --b.
Oddly enough, it seems like I'm subscribed this list (called "linux-nfsv4"):
http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfsv4&r=1&b=201004&w=2
rather than
http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&r=1&b=201004&w=2
Although my subscription messages from majordomo@vger.kernel.org
say "linux-nfs"
The former is essentially nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, right?
Maybe I got bounced off of linux-nfs.org for some reason...
Benny
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-27 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-22 14:32 [PATCH 1/2] nfsd4: complete enforcement of 4.1 op ordering J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-22 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd4: implement reclaim_complete J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-22 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd4: complete enforcement of 4.1 op ordering J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-22 15:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-23 21:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-23 23:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-24 0:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-27 15:03 ` Benny Halevy
2010-04-27 14:40 ` Benny Halevy
2010-04-27 15:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-27 15:44 ` Benny Halevy
2010-04-27 16:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-27 15:46 ` Benny Halevy
2010-04-27 16:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-27 16:22 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2010-04-27 16:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-27 16:44 ` Benny Halevy
2010-04-27 18:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD70F5F.7080409@panasas.com \
--to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=postmaster@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox