* What is proper kernel tree to develop against? @ 2011-06-08 18:41 Ben Greear 2011-06-08 18:52 ` Jim Rees 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2011-06-08 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-nfs What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches for possible upstream acceptance? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against? 2011-06-08 18:41 What is proper kernel tree to develop against? Ben Greear @ 2011-06-08 18:52 ` Jim Rees 2011-06-08 19:03 ` J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jim Rees @ 2011-06-08 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Greear; +Cc: linux-nfs Ben Greear wrote: What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches for possible upstream acceptance? I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate. Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs. http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against? 2011-06-08 18:52 ` Jim Rees @ 2011-06-08 19:03 ` J. Bruce Fields 2011-06-08 19:49 ` Weston Andros Adamson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2011-06-08 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Rees; +Cc: Ben Greear, linux-nfs On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: > > What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches > for possible upstream acceptance? > > I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at > kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate. > > Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these > questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs. > > http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page. I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki some day. --b. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against? 2011-06-08 19:03 ` J. Bruce Fields @ 2011-06-08 19:49 ` Weston Andros Adamson 2011-06-08 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Weston Andros Adamson @ 2011-06-08 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: J. Bruce Fields; +Cc: Jim Rees, Ben Greear, linux-nfs On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:03 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote: >> Ben Greear wrote: >> >> What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches >> for possible upstream acceptance? >> >> I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at >> kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate. >> >> Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these >> questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs. >> >> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page > > It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page. > > I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki > some day. I've actually signed up to revamp linux-nfs.org. I'll begin work on that very soon (after bakeathon and my vacation). -dros ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against? 2011-06-08 19:49 ` Weston Andros Adamson @ 2011-06-08 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2011-06-08 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Weston Andros Adamson; +Cc: Jim Rees, Ben Greear, linux-nfs On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:49:38PM -0400, Weston Andros Adamson wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:03 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote: > >> Ben Greear wrote: > >> > >> What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches > >> for possible upstream acceptance? > >> > >> I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at > >> kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate. > >> > >> Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these > >> questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs. > >> > >> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page > > > > It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page. > > > > I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki > > some day. > > I've actually signed up to revamp linux-nfs.org. I'll begin work on that very soon (after bakeathon and my vacation). OK, good! --b. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-08 20:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-06-08 18:41 What is proper kernel tree to develop against? Ben Greear 2011-06-08 18:52 ` Jim Rees 2011-06-08 19:03 ` J. Bruce Fields 2011-06-08 19:49 ` Weston Andros Adamson 2011-06-08 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox