From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: More fun with unmounting ESTALE directories.
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:25:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130218132509.0ce779de@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130214104230.013b7f71@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7243 bytes --]
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:42:30 -0500 Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:38:13 +1100
> NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been exploring difficulties with unmounting stale directories and
> > discovered another bug.
> >
> > If I:
> >
> > SERVER: mkdir /foo/bar #and make sure it is exported
> > CLIENT: mount -o vers=4 server:/foo/bar /mnt
> > SERVER: rm -r /foo
> > CLIENT: > /mnt/baz # gets an error of course
> > CLIENT: ls -l /mnt # error again
> > CLIENT: umount /mnt
> >
> > The result of that last command is:
> >
> > /mnt was not found in /proc/mounts
> > /mnt was not found in /proc/mounts
> >
> > Strange?
> >
> > cat /proc/mounts
> >
> > .....
> > 10.0.2.2://foo/bar /mnt\040(deleted) nfs4 rw,relatime,vers=4,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=10.0.2.15,minorversion=0,local_lock=none,addr=10.0.2.2 0 0
> > ....
> >
> > Notice the "\040(deleted)".
> >
> > NFS has unhashed that directory because it is obviously bad, and d_path()
> > notices and adds " (deleted)".
> >
> > Now I might be able to argue that NFS shouldn't be unhashing a directory that
> > is a mountpoint - it certainly seems strange behaviour.
> >
> > But I think I can more strongly argue that /proc/mounts shouldn't be showing
> > the mounted directory, but instead the directory that it is mounted on.
> > Obviously these both have the same name so it shouldn't matter ... except
> > that here is a case where it does.
> >
> > I "fixed" it with
> >
> > --- a/fs/proc_namespace.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc_namespace.c
> > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int show_vfsmnt(struct seq_file *m, struct vfsmount *mnt)
> > {
> > struct mount *r = real_mount(mnt);
> > int err = 0;
> > - struct path mnt_path = { .dentry = mnt->mnt_root, .mnt = mnt };
> > + struct path mnt_path = { .dentry = r->mnt_mountpoint, .mnt = &(r->mnt_parent)->mnt };
> > struct super_block *sb = mnt_path.dentry->d_sb;
> >
> > if (sb->s_op->show_devname) {
> >
> > though I suspect that isn't safe and needs some locking.
> >
> > Probably both should be fixed: NFS should not invalidate any mounted
> > directory, and show_vfsmnt() should report the mointpoint, not the mounted
> > directory.
> >
> > I can't figure out any way to get NFS to not invalidate the mounted directory.
> > I think it happens in nfs_lookup_revalidate() when it calls d_drop(), but I
> > don't know how to tell if a given dentry is a mnt_root for any mountpoint.
> >
> > Suggestions? Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > NeilBrown
> >
>
> I've also been looking at some weird ESTALE problems. Here's another
> fun one that doesn't involve mountpoints. Assume here that we're
> working in the same exported directory on client and server:
>
> server# mkdir a
> client# cd a
> server# mv a a.bak
> client# sleep 30 # (or whatever the dir attrcache timeout is)
> client# stat .
> stat: cannot stat ‘.’: Stale NFS file handle
>
> Obviously, "." should not be stale. It got renamed, but the inode still
> exists on the server.
>
> If you sniff on the wire, you'll see that the server doesn't ever send
> an ESTALE here. What happens is that due to FS_REVAL_DOT being set, we
> end up trying to revalidate the dentry that "." refers to. We find that
> the parent changed (obviously) and then try to redo the lookup of "a".
> At that point we notice that it doesn't exist and turn it into ESTALE.
>
> I don't really understand the point of FS_REVAL_DOT. What does that
> actually buy us? I wonder if removing it would also help your testcase?
>
I think that is a slightly different issue, but certainly related.
I have hit your problem before and have the following patch in SLES. I think
I tried pushing it upstream, but didn't get much in the way of a useful
response.
(patch is space-damaged - don't try to apply with 'patch').
BTW I have another problem, related to this one and which could be fixed by
removing FS_REVAL_DOT.
If you
mount -o vers=4,noac server:/some/path /mnt
then stop nfsd on the server and
umount /mnt
it hangs.
Partly it hangs because 'mount' tries to do a 'readlink' on the mountpoint.
I can probably get it to not do that (or use --no-canonicalize).
But then sys_umount hangs because it tries to check with the server that the
thing being unmounted really is still a directory...
I would be really nice if sys_unmount used a LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT flag that
works a bit like LOOKUP_PARENT and LOOKUP_NOFOLLOW in that it skips the very
last step and returns the mounted-on directory, not the mountpoint that is
mounted there - or at least makes sure not revalidate happens on that final
mounted directory.
I think FS_REVAL_DOT is needed so that if you call stat("."), it will update
attributes from the server if the cache is old. However it seems to do a
whole lot more than that, including "lookup" calls which it I'm sure is wrong.
NeilBrown
Subject: [PATCH] nfs - handle d_revalidate of 'dot' correctly.
When d_revalidate is called on a dentry because FS_REVAL_DOT is set
it isn't really appropriate to revalidate the name.
If the path was simply ".", then the current-working-directory could
have been renamed on the server and should still be accessible as "."
even if it has a new name.
If the path was "/some/long/path/.", then the final component ("path" in
this case) has already been revalidated and there is no particular
need to do it again.
If we change nd->last_type to refer to "the last component looked at"
rather than just "the last component", then these cases can be
detected by "nd->last_type != LAST_NORM".
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
fs/namei.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/dir.c | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-3.0-SLE11-SP2.orig/fs/namei.c
+++ linux-3.0-SLE11-SP2/fs/namei.c
@@ -1460,6 +1460,7 @@ static int link_path_walk(const char *na
}
}
+ nd->last_type = type;
/* remove trailing slashes? */
if (!c)
goto last_component;
@@ -1486,7 +1487,6 @@ last_component:
/* Clear LOOKUP_CONTINUE iff it was previously unset */
nd->flags &= lookup_flags | ~LOOKUP_CONTINUE;
nd->last = this;
- nd->last_type = type;
return 0;
}
terminate_walk(nd);
--- linux-3.0-SLE11-SP2.orig/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ linux-3.0-SLE11-SP2/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -1138,6 +1138,15 @@ static int nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct
if (NFS_STALE(inode))
goto out_bad;
+ if (nd->last_type != LAST_NORM) {
+ /* name not relevant, just inode */
+ error = nfs_revalidate_inode(NFS_SERVER(inode), inode);
+ if (error)
+ goto out_bad;
+ else
+ goto out_valid;
+ }
+
error = -ENOMEM;
fhandle = nfs_alloc_fhandle();
fattr = nfs_alloc_fattr();
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-18 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-12 0:38 More fun with unmounting ESTALE directories NeilBrown
2013-02-14 15:42 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-18 2:25 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-02-18 12:41 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-18 15:36 ` Chuck Lever
2013-02-18 21:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-18 22:05 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-18 22:16 ` Chuck Lever
2013-02-18 18:46 ` Al Viro
2013-02-18 19:46 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-18 20:15 ` Al Viro
2013-02-18 23:14 ` NeilBrown
2013-02-19 12:33 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-18 23:10 ` NeilBrown
2013-02-18 23:17 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-02-18 23:31 ` NeilBrown
2013-02-19 14:27 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130218132509.0ce779de@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox