From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH, RFC] nfsd: fix nfsd4_cb_recall_done error handling
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:29:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140922182923.GA18904@infradead.org> (raw)
The error handling for CB_RECALL seems fairly broken to me.
What looks good:
- for EBADHANDLE and NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID retry until dl_retries
hits zero, then mark the connection down and set cb_done
What looks wrong:
- for everything else we first mark the connection down, then
retry until dl_retries hits zero, then mark the connection down
again and set cb_done.
>From all I can see what we want is:
- keep the behavior for EBADHANDLE and NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
otherwise jump straight to making the connection down
and setting cb_done
But maybe I'm missing something?
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
index 17d5441..ed25c58 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
@@ -971,24 +971,21 @@ static void nfsd4_cb_recall_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
return;
switch (task->tk_status) {
case 0:
- cb->cb_done = true;
- return;
+ break;
case -EBADHANDLE:
case -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID:
/* Race: client probably got cb_recall
* before open reply granting delegation */
- break;
+ if (dp->dl_retries--) {
+ rpc_delay(task, 2*HZ);
+ task->tk_status = 0;
+ rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
+ return;
+ }
default:
/* Network partition? */
nfsd4_mark_cb_down(clp, task->tk_status);
}
- if (dp->dl_retries--) {
- rpc_delay(task, 2*HZ);
- task->tk_status = 0;
- rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
- return;
- }
- nfsd4_mark_cb_down(clp, task->tk_status);
cb->cb_done = true;
}
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-22 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-22 18:29 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-09-22 20:03 ` [PATCH, RFC] nfsd: fix nfsd4_cb_recall_done error handling Trond Myklebust
2014-09-22 20:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-22 20:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140922182923.GA18904@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox