From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] nfsd: fix nfsd4_cb_recall_done error handling
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:25:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140922202550.GH26763@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140922182923.GA18904@infradead.org>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:29:23AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The error handling for CB_RECALL seems fairly broken to me.
>
> What looks good:
>
> - for EBADHANDLE and NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID retry until dl_retries
> hits zero, then mark the connection down and set cb_done
>
> What looks wrong:
>
> - for everything else we first mark the connection down, then
> retry until dl_retries hits zero, then mark the connection down
> again and set cb_done.
>
> >From all I can see what we want is:
>
> - keep the behavior for EBADHANDLE and NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
> otherwise jump straight to making the connection down
> and setting cb_done
>
> But maybe I'm missing something?
I can't think of anything; let me know when you want something applied.
--b.
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> index 17d5441..ed25c58 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> @@ -971,24 +971,21 @@ static void nfsd4_cb_recall_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
> return;
> switch (task->tk_status) {
> case 0:
> - cb->cb_done = true;
> - return;
> + break;
> case -EBADHANDLE:
> case -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID:
> /* Race: client probably got cb_recall
> * before open reply granting delegation */
> - break;
> + if (dp->dl_retries--) {
> + rpc_delay(task, 2*HZ);
> + task->tk_status = 0;
> + rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
> + return;
> + }
> default:
> /* Network partition? */
> nfsd4_mark_cb_down(clp, task->tk_status);
> }
> - if (dp->dl_retries--) {
> - rpc_delay(task, 2*HZ);
> - task->tk_status = 0;
> - rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
> - return;
> - }
> - nfsd4_mark_cb_down(clp, task->tk_status);
> cb->cb_done = true;
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-22 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-22 18:29 [PATCH, RFC] nfsd: fix nfsd4_cb_recall_done error handling Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-22 20:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-09-22 20:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-22 20:25 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140922202550.GH26763@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox