public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: implement chage_attr_type attribute
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:27:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141111102735.GB17313@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141110175424.GC32702@fieldses.org>

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:54:24PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Shouldn't that be NFS4_CHANGE_TYPE_IS_MONOTONIC_INCR?
> 
> The draft says that e.g. "If the client sees
> NFS4_CHANGE_TYPE_IS_VERSION_COUNTER, it has the ability to predict what
> the resulting change attribute value should be after a COMPOUND
> containing a SETATTR, WRITE, or CREATE."
> 
> Admittedly, I'm not completely sure what that means.  (Is a SETATTR of
> multiple attributes a single atomic change?  Can we predict the change
> attribute on a newly created file, or only on the parent directory?)  I
> also don't know where the filesystems do the i_version increment (can we
> guarantee it happens once per nfs WRITE?).

Actually the server may increment it many times for a single WRITE,
for XFS it is incremented for each dirty transaction, which could
happen many times during a single write:

 (1) c/mtime update
 (2) suid/sgid bit removal
 (3) block allocation (could be multiple transactions)


So I guess we really should move to NFS4_CHANGE_TYPE_IS_MONOTONIC_INCR
instead.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-11 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-08 12:11 nfsd: add support for the chage_attr_type attribute Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-08 12:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: correctly define v4.2 support attributes Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 22:21   ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-11-11 10:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-08 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: implement chage_attr_type attribute Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 17:54   ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-11-11 10:27     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-11-11 12:36       ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-11 16:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-11 22:27           ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-12 10:24             ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-12 14:26               ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-13  0:28                 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-13 13:02                   ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-13 21:47                     ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-13 23:54                     ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-14  0:43                       ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-14  4:35                         ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-14 14:22                           ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-15  1:24                             ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-11 21:42       ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-12-01 19:50         ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-12-02 17:23           ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 21:42 ` nfsd: add support for the " J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141111102735.GB17313@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox