From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: implement chage_attr_type attribute
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:54:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141113235400.GM28565@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHQdGtRvaOTT7375p0eDjPPm+uFc19AJkf-NWDAKq-=goqZSpA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 08:02:43AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:26:16AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:27:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> >> To clarify what Christoph wrote, XFS updates i_version is updated
> >> >> once per transaction that modifies the inode. So if a VFS level
> >> >> operation results in multiple transactions then each transaction
> >> >> will but the version.
> >> >>
> >> >> It was implemented that way because nobody could tell me what the
> >> >> actual granularity requirement for change detection was. Hence what
> >> >> I implemented was "be able to detect any persistent change that is
> >> >> made" to cover all bases.
FWIW, ext4 takes the same approach. See Ted's post today:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg46194.html
"The inode_inc_iversion() in mark4_ext4_iloc_dirty() is probably not
necessary, since we already should be incrementing i_version whenever
ctime and mtime gets updated. The inode_inc_iversion() there is more
of a "belt and suspenders" safety thing, on the theory that the extra
bump in i_version won't hurt anything."
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-13 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-08 12:11 nfsd: add support for the chage_attr_type attribute Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-08 12:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: correctly define v4.2 support attributes Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-11-11 10:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-08 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: implement chage_attr_type attribute Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 17:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-11-11 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-11 12:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-11 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-11 22:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-12 10:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-12 14:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-13 0:28 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-13 13:02 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-13 21:47 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-13 23:54 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-11-14 0:43 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-14 4:35 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-14 14:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-15 1:24 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-11 21:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-12-01 19:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-12-02 17:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 21:42 ` nfsd: add support for the " J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141113235400.GM28565@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox