From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields),
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: what on earth is going on here? paths above mountpoints turn into "(unreachable)"
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:07:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150211140714.4da42a5b@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zj8l7j3z.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2723 bytes --]
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:48:48 +0000 Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> wrote:
> On 5 Feb 2015, NeilBrown spake thusly:
>
> > On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 23:28:17 +0000 Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> wrote:
> >> It doesn't. It still recurs.
> >
> > Is /usr/archive still exported to mutilate with crossmnt?
> > If it is, can you change to not do that (it is quite possible to have
> > different export options for different clients).
>
> OK. Adjusted.
>
> > I think that if crossmnt is enabled on the server, then explicitly
> > mounting /usr/archive/series will have the same net effect as not doing so
> > (though I'm not 100% certain).
> >
> > Also, can you try changing
> > /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nfs_mountpoint_timeout
> >
> > It defaults to 500 (seconds - time for light from Sun to reach Earth).
> > If you make it smaller and the problem gets worse, or make it much bigger
> > and the problem goes away, that would be interesting.
> > If it makes no difference, that also would be interesting.
>
> Seems to make no difference, which is distinctly surprising. If
> anything, it happens more often at the default value than at either the
> high or low values. It's very erratic: it happened ten times in one day,
> then three days passed and it didn't happen at all... system under
> very similar load the whole time.
>
> >From other prompts, what I'm seeing now -- but wasn't then, before I
> took the crossmnt out -- is an epidemic of spontaneous unmounting: i.e.,
> /usr/archive/series suddenly vanishes until remounted.
>
> I might just reboot all systems involved in this mess and hope it goes
> away. I have no *clue* what's going on, I've never seen it before, maybe
> it'll stop if I no longer believe in it.
>
This all sounds remarkably similar to a problem that a customer reported
recently.
In that case the server was a NetApp and v4 was in use and the server seemed
to suggest that it was using volatile file handles.
If a filehandle for a mounted-on directory changes, then (I think) a new
inode will be allocated and the mountpoint will effectively disappear
(though I think it should remain in /proc/mounts).
However your have a Linux server and v3, so if it is the same problem, then I
completely mis-diagnosed it.
I wonder if something is going wrong in nfs_prime_dcache(). The code looks
right, but it is a little complex...
You could rule that out by disabling READDIRPLUS by using the nordirplus
mount option. If that makes the proble go away, it would be very
interesting...
A more intrusive debugging approach would be to get d_drop() to scream if the
dentry being dropped had DCACHE_MOUNTED set.
Are you able to try either of those?
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-11 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-03 0:25 what on earth is going on here? paths above mountpoints turn into "(unreachable)" Nix
2015-02-03 19:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-02-03 19:57 ` Nix
2015-02-04 23:28 ` Nix
2015-02-05 0:26 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-10 17:48 ` Nix
2015-02-10 18:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-02-11 23:07 ` Nix
2015-02-11 23:18 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-12 1:50 ` Nix
2015-02-12 15:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-02-14 13:17 ` Nix
2015-02-16 2:46 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-16 3:57 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-17 17:32 ` Nix
2015-02-20 17:26 ` Nix
2015-02-20 21:03 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-16 4:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-02-16 4:54 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-22 22:13 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-02-22 22:47 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-23 2:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-02-23 2:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-02-23 3:05 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-23 3:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-02-23 4:49 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-23 13:55 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-02-16 15:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-02-11 3:07 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-02-11 23:11 ` Nix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150211140714.4da42a5b@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox