From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH, RFC] backchannel overflows
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:21:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150428202157.GA23972@infradead.org> (raw)
Currently the client will just crap out if a CB_NULL comes in at the
same time as a slot controlled CB_COMPOUND that includes a CB_SEQUENCE.
I don't really understand how the spec wants to treat CB_NULL in
relation to the available backchannel slots, but given that it's
not part of the sequences in CB_SEQUENCE it somehow nees to bypass them.
If we make sure to overallocate the rpc-level buffers so that we
have more than the available NFS-level slots we should be safe from
this condition which makes a 4.1 server doing heavy recalls under
load very unhapy by not returning an NFS level reply to its layout
recalls.
I dont really like this patch much, so any idea for a better solution
would be highly welcome!
diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback.h b/fs/nfs/callback.h
index 84326e9..7afb3ef 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback.h
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ extern int nfs4_set_callback_sessionid(struct nfs_client *clp);
* so we limit their concurrency to 1 by setting up the maximum number
* of slots for the backchannel.
*/
-#define NFS41_BC_MIN_CALLBACKS 1
+#define NFS41_BC_MIN_CALLBACKS 2
#define NFS41_BC_MAX_CALLBACKS 1
extern unsigned int nfs_callback_set_tcpport;
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 20:21 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-04-29 12:08 ` [PATCH, RFC] backchannel overflows Kinglong Mee
2015-04-29 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-29 14:55 ` Chuck Lever
2015-04-29 14:58 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-04-29 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-29 15:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-04-29 17:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-30 6:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-30 14:34 ` Chuck Lever
2015-04-30 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CAHQdGtRgEVXidNNYtYf4c3uS0vc6fbm-SZ5AxrY=awXYynmACw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-04-30 15:02 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-04-30 15:11 ` Chuck Lever
2015-04-30 17:41 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-01 17:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-01 17:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-05-01 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-01 17:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-05-01 17:31 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150428202157.GA23972@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox