[nfs:linux-next 50/51] fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:187:1: sparse: symbol 'ff_layout_remove_mirror' was not declared. Should it be static?

[nfs:linux-next 50/51] fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:187:1: sparse: symbol 'ff_layout_remove_mirror' was not declared. Should it be static?

[kbuild test robot]

tree:   git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git linux-next
head:   fd263b4f66bc592fe429f155d6bd20a25d3b6615
commit: 87cb6090f01142079e37dbbc8ab9db2625694ae0 [50/51] NFSv4.1/flexfile: Ensure uniqueness of mirrors across layout segments
reproduce:
  # apt-get install sparse
  git checkout 87cb6090f01142079e37dbbc8ab9db2625694ae0
  make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
  make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:187:1: sparse: symbol 'ff_layout_remove_mirror' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[PATCH nfs] NFSv4.1/flexfile: ff_layout_remove_mirror can be static

[kbuild test robot]

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 flexfilelayout.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
index 2103527..22d1791 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ ff_layout_add_mirror(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
 	return mirror;
 }
 
-void
+static void
 ff_layout_remove_mirror(struct nfs4_ff_layout_mirror *mirror)
 {
 	struct inode *inode;