From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] nfsd: Fix race in lock stateid creation
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:00:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103120016.6200-6-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103120016.6200-5-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
If we're looking up a new lock state, and the creation fails, then
we want to unhash it, just like we do for OPEN. However in order
to do so, we need to that no other LOCK requests can grab the
mutex until we have unhashed it (and marked it as closed).
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index f93ca0682aaa..f13fba4f51ec 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -5630,14 +5630,41 @@ alloc_init_lock_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfs4_client *clp,
return ret;
}
-static void
+static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
+find_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct nfs4_file *fp)
+{
+ struct nfs4_ol_stateid *lst;
+ struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&clp->cl_lock);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(lst, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
+ if (lst->st_stid.sc_type != NFS4_LOCK_STID)
+ continue;
+ if (lst->st_stid.sc_file == fp) {
+ atomic_inc(&lst->st_stid.sc_count);
+ return lst;
+ }
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
init_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lo,
struct nfs4_file *fp, struct inode *inode,
struct nfs4_ol_stateid *open_stp)
{
struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
+ struct nfs4_ol_stateid *retstp;
- lockdep_assert_held(&clp->cl_lock);
+ mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
+retry:
+ spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
+ spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
+ retstp = find_lock_stateid(lo, fp);
+ if (retstp)
+ goto out_unlock;
atomic_inc(&stp->st_stid.sc_count);
stp->st_stid.sc_type = NFS4_LOCK_STID;
@@ -5647,31 +5674,22 @@ init_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lo,
stp->st_access_bmap = 0;
stp->st_deny_bmap = open_stp->st_deny_bmap;
stp->st_openstp = open_stp;
- mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
list_add(&stp->st_locks, &open_stp->st_locks);
list_add(&stp->st_perstateowner, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids);
- spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
list_add(&stp->st_perfile, &fp->fi_stateids);
+out_unlock:
spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
-}
-
-static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
-find_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct nfs4_file *fp)
-{
- struct nfs4_ol_stateid *lst;
- struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
-
- lockdep_assert_held(&clp->cl_lock);
-
- list_for_each_entry(lst, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
- if (lst->st_stid.sc_type != NFS4_LOCK_STID)
- continue;
- if (lst->st_stid.sc_file == fp) {
- atomic_inc(&lst->st_stid.sc_count);
- return lst;
+ spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
+ if (retstp) {
+ if (nfsd4_lock_ol_stateid(retstp) != nfs_ok) {
+ nfs4_put_stid(&retstp->st_stid);
+ goto retry;
}
+ /* To keep mutex tracking happy */
+ mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
+ stp = retstp;
}
- return NULL;
+ return stp;
}
static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
@@ -5684,26 +5702,25 @@ find_or_create_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct nfs4_file *fi,
struct nfs4_openowner *oo = openowner(ost->st_stateowner);
struct nfs4_client *clp = oo->oo_owner.so_client;
+ *new = false;
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
lst = find_lock_stateid(lo, fi);
- if (lst == NULL) {
- spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
- ns = nfs4_alloc_stid(clp, stateid_slab, nfs4_free_lock_stateid);
- if (ns == NULL)
- return NULL;
-
- spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
- lst = find_lock_stateid(lo, fi);
- if (likely(!lst)) {
- lst = openlockstateid(ns);
- init_lock_stateid(lst, lo, fi, inode, ost);
- ns = NULL;
- *new = true;
- }
- }
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
- if (ns)
+ if (lst != NULL) {
+ if (nfsd4_lock_ol_stateid(lst) == nfs_ok)
+ goto out;
+ nfs4_put_stid(&lst->st_stid);
+ }
+ ns = nfs4_alloc_stid(clp, stateid_slab, nfs4_free_lock_stateid);
+ if (ns == NULL)
+ return NULL;
+
+ lst = init_lock_stateid(openlockstateid(ns), lo, fi, inode, ost);
+ if (lst == openlockstateid(ns))
+ *new = true;
+ else
nfs4_put_stid(ns);
+out:
return lst;
}
@@ -5755,17 +5772,12 @@ lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
goto out;
}
-retry:
lst = find_or_create_lock_stateid(lo, fi, inode, ost, new);
if (lst == NULL) {
status = nfserr_jukebox;
goto out;
}
- if (nfsd4_lock_ol_stateid(lst) != nfs_ok) {
- nfs4_put_stid(&lst->st_stid);
- goto retry;
- }
status = nfs_ok;
*plst = lst;
out:
@@ -5971,14 +5983,16 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
seqid_mutating_err(ntohl(status)))
lock_sop->lo_owner.so_seqid++;
- mutex_unlock(&lock_stp->st_mutex);
-
/*
* If this is a new, never-before-used stateid, and we are
* returning an error, then just go ahead and release it.
*/
- if (status && new)
+ if (status && new) {
+ lock_stp->st_stid.sc_type = NFS4_CLOSED_STID;
release_lock_stateid(lock_stp);
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&lock_stp->st_mutex);
nfs4_put_stid(&lock_stp->st_stid);
}
--
2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-03 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-03 12:00 [PATCH v2 0/7] Tighten up locking around stateids in knfsd Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] nfsd: Fix stateid races between OPEN and CLOSE Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] nfsd: Fix another OPEN stateid race Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] nfsd: CLOSE SHOULD return the invalid special stateid for NFSv4.x (x>0) Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] nfsd: Ensure we don't recognise lock stateids after freeing them Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] nfsd: Ensure we check stateid validity in the seqid operation checks Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] nfsd: Fix races with check_stateid_generation() Trond Myklebust
2017-11-07 21:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] nfsd: Fix race in lock stateid creation J. Bruce Fields
2017-11-07 20:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Tighten up locking around stateids in knfsd J. Bruce Fields
2017-11-07 20:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-11-07 21:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171103120016.6200-6-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--to=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox