From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] nfsd: Fix race in lock stateid creation
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 16:37:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171107213719.GG24262@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103120016.6200-6-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 08:00:14AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> If we're looking up a new lock state, and the creation fails, then
> we want to unhash it, just like we do for OPEN. However in order
> to do so, we need to that no other LOCK requests can grab the
> mutex until we have unhashed it (and marked it as closed).
I split the move of find_lock_stateid() into a separate patch just to
make it easier for me to read the result.... Looks fine otherwise.
--b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index f93ca0682aaa..f13fba4f51ec 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -5630,14 +5630,41 @@ alloc_init_lock_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfs4_client *clp,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void
> +static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
> +find_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct nfs4_file *fp)
> +{
> + struct nfs4_ol_stateid *lst;
> + struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&clp->cl_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(lst, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
> + if (lst->st_stid.sc_type != NFS4_LOCK_STID)
> + continue;
> + if (lst->st_stid.sc_file == fp) {
> + atomic_inc(&lst->st_stid.sc_count);
> + return lst;
> + }
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
> init_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lo,
> struct nfs4_file *fp, struct inode *inode,
> struct nfs4_ol_stateid *open_stp)
> {
> struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
> + struct nfs4_ol_stateid *retstp;
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&clp->cl_lock);
> + mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
> + mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
> +retry:
> + spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> + spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
> + retstp = find_lock_stateid(lo, fp);
> + if (retstp)
> + goto out_unlock;
>
> atomic_inc(&stp->st_stid.sc_count);
> stp->st_stid.sc_type = NFS4_LOCK_STID;
> @@ -5647,31 +5674,22 @@ init_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lo,
> stp->st_access_bmap = 0;
> stp->st_deny_bmap = open_stp->st_deny_bmap;
> stp->st_openstp = open_stp;
> - mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
> list_add(&stp->st_locks, &open_stp->st_locks);
> list_add(&stp->st_perstateowner, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids);
> - spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
> list_add(&stp->st_perfile, &fp->fi_stateids);
> +out_unlock:
> spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
> -find_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct nfs4_file *fp)
> -{
> - struct nfs4_ol_stateid *lst;
> - struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
> -
> - lockdep_assert_held(&clp->cl_lock);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(lst, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
> - if (lst->st_stid.sc_type != NFS4_LOCK_STID)
> - continue;
> - if (lst->st_stid.sc_file == fp) {
> - atomic_inc(&lst->st_stid.sc_count);
> - return lst;
> + spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> + if (retstp) {
> + if (nfsd4_lock_ol_stateid(retstp) != nfs_ok) {
> + nfs4_put_stid(&retstp->st_stid);
> + goto retry;
> }
> + /* To keep mutex tracking happy */
> + mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
> + stp = retstp;
> }
> - return NULL;
> + return stp;
> }
>
> static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
> @@ -5684,26 +5702,25 @@ find_or_create_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct nfs4_file *fi,
> struct nfs4_openowner *oo = openowner(ost->st_stateowner);
> struct nfs4_client *clp = oo->oo_owner.so_client;
>
> + *new = false;
> spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> lst = find_lock_stateid(lo, fi);
> - if (lst == NULL) {
> - spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> - ns = nfs4_alloc_stid(clp, stateid_slab, nfs4_free_lock_stateid);
> - if (ns == NULL)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> - lst = find_lock_stateid(lo, fi);
> - if (likely(!lst)) {
> - lst = openlockstateid(ns);
> - init_lock_stateid(lst, lo, fi, inode, ost);
> - ns = NULL;
> - *new = true;
> - }
> - }
> spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> - if (ns)
> + if (lst != NULL) {
> + if (nfsd4_lock_ol_stateid(lst) == nfs_ok)
> + goto out;
> + nfs4_put_stid(&lst->st_stid);
> + }
> + ns = nfs4_alloc_stid(clp, stateid_slab, nfs4_free_lock_stateid);
> + if (ns == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + lst = init_lock_stateid(openlockstateid(ns), lo, fi, inode, ost);
> + if (lst == openlockstateid(ns))
> + *new = true;
> + else
> nfs4_put_stid(ns);
> +out:
> return lst;
> }
>
> @@ -5755,17 +5772,12 @@ lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> goto out;
> }
>
> -retry:
> lst = find_or_create_lock_stateid(lo, fi, inode, ost, new);
> if (lst == NULL) {
> status = nfserr_jukebox;
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (nfsd4_lock_ol_stateid(lst) != nfs_ok) {
> - nfs4_put_stid(&lst->st_stid);
> - goto retry;
> - }
> status = nfs_ok;
> *plst = lst;
> out:
> @@ -5971,14 +5983,16 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> seqid_mutating_err(ntohl(status)))
> lock_sop->lo_owner.so_seqid++;
>
> - mutex_unlock(&lock_stp->st_mutex);
> -
> /*
> * If this is a new, never-before-used stateid, and we are
> * returning an error, then just go ahead and release it.
> */
> - if (status && new)
> + if (status && new) {
> + lock_stp->st_stid.sc_type = NFS4_CLOSED_STID;
> release_lock_stateid(lock_stp);
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&lock_stp->st_mutex);
>
> nfs4_put_stid(&lock_stp->st_stid);
> }
> --
> 2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-07 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-03 12:00 [PATCH v2 0/7] Tighten up locking around stateids in knfsd Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] nfsd: Fix stateid races between OPEN and CLOSE Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] nfsd: Fix another OPEN stateid race Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] nfsd: CLOSE SHOULD return the invalid special stateid for NFSv4.x (x>0) Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] nfsd: Ensure we don't recognise lock stateids after freeing them Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] nfsd: Fix race in lock stateid creation Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] nfsd: Ensure we check stateid validity in the seqid operation checks Trond Myklebust
2017-11-03 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] nfsd: Fix races with check_stateid_generation() Trond Myklebust
2017-11-07 21:37 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2017-11-07 20:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Tighten up locking around stateids in knfsd J. Bruce Fields
2017-11-07 20:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-11-07 21:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171107213719.GG24262@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox