From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com>,
NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:48:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190116024832.GA26146@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190116133552.37436b9c@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:35:52PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c: In function 'xs_flush_bvec':
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:390:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'for_each_bvec'; did you mean 'for_each_net'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> for_each_bvec(bv, bvec, bi, bi)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> for_each_net
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:390:33: error: expected ';' before 'flush_dcache_page'
> for_each_bvec(bv, bvec, bi, bi)
> ^
> ;
> flush_dcache_page(bv.bv_page);
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> f3effe4c1240 ("block: rename bvec helpers")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> 6a829eb8619f ("SUNRPC: Fix TCP receive code on archs with flush_dcache_page()")
>
> from the nfs-anna tree.
>
> [I love API changes :-(]
>
> I have applied the following merge fix patch:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:32:59 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: merge fix for "block: rename bvec helpers"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index 7754aa3e434f..47f29cc23f27 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ xs_flush_bvec(const struct bio_vec *bvec, size_t count, size_t seek)
> struct bio_vec bv;
>
> bvec_iter_advance(bvec, &bi, seek & PAGE_MASK);
> - for_each_bvec(bv, bvec, bi, bi)
> + for_each_segment(bv, bvec, bi, bi)
> flush_dcache_page(bv.bv_page);
> }
> #else
This fix is correct, thanks!
Thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-16 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-16 2:35 linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-01-16 2:48 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190116024832.GA26146@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=trondmy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox