public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org, jlayton@kernel.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 0/5] un-deprecate nfsdcld
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:06:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190326220630.2911-1-smayhew@redhat.com> (raw)

When nfsdcld was released, it was quickly deprecated in favor of the
nfsdcltrack usermodehelper, so as to not require another running daemon.
That prevents NFSv4 clients from reclaiming locks from nfsd's running in
containers, since neither nfsdcltrack nor the legacy client tracking
code work in containers.  These patches un-deprecate the use of nfsdcld
for NFSv4 client tracking.

These patches are intended to go alongside some nfs-utils patches that
introduce an enhancement that allows nfsd to "slurp" up the client
records during client tracking initialization and store them internally
in hash table.  This enables nfsd to check whether an NFSv4 client is
allowed to reclaim without having to do an upcall to nfsdcld.  It also
allows nfsd to decide to end the v4 grace period early if the number of
RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations it has received from "known" clients is
equal to the number of entries in the hash table.  It also allows nfsd
to skip the v4 grace period altogether if it knows there are no clients
allowed to reclaim.

There is a fallback to allow nfsd to continue to work with older nfsdcld
daemons in the event that any are out in the wild (unlikely).
Everything should work fine except nfsd will not be able to exit the
grace period early or skip the grace period altogether.

v3:
- nfs4_state_start_net() now calls nfsd4_end_grace() instead of
  open-coding it
- Removed some unnecessary initializations of nr_reclaim_complete
- Removed dec_reclaim_complete() altogether.  If we're calling
  expire_client() as a result of receiving a DESTROY_CLIENTID or
  SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM then we wouldn't want to decrement the count.  And
  laundromat thread never expires clients due to loss of lease until the
  grace period is over (the laundromat gets rescheduled by 1 second as
  long as clients are reclaiming during that 1 second, for up to 2x the
  original grace period in total).  So dec_reclaim_complete() is
  unnecessary.
- Changed the preference order of client tracking methods.  The new
  order is 1) new nfdscld, 2) old nfsdcld, 3) nfsdcltrack, 4) legacy
  v4recovery directory.
- Added some special handling of legacy records sent by nfsdcld in the
  GraceStart downcalls.  nfsdcld will do a one-time "upgrade" from old
  tracking methods.  No changes are needed to accomodate nfsdcltrack
  records, but legacy records will be prefixed with the string "hash:", 
  and in the event that we do have legacy records in the
  reclaim_str_hashtbl we may need to do a second lookup using the hash
  in the event that a lookup using the client name string fails.

v2:
- Addressed some coding style issues in nfsd4_create_clid_dir() &
  nfsd4_remove_clid_dir()

Scott Mayhew (5):
  nfsd: make nfs4_client_reclaim use an xdr_netobj instead of a fixed
    char array
  nfsd: un-deprecate nfsdcld
  nfsd: keep a tally of RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations when using nfsdcld
  nfsd: re-order client tracking method selection
  nfsd: handle legacy client tracking records sent by nfsdcld

 fs/nfsd/netns.h               |   3 +
 fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c         | 436 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c           |  63 +++--
 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c              |   1 +
 fs/nfsd/state.h               |   8 +-
 include/uapi/linux/nfsd/cld.h |   1 +
 6 files changed, 457 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.2


             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-26 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-26 22:06 Scott Mayhew [this message]
2019-03-26 22:06 ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/5] nfsd: make nfs4_client_reclaim use an xdr_netobj instead of a fixed char array Scott Mayhew
2019-03-26 22:06 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/5] nfsd: un-deprecate nfsdcld Scott Mayhew
2019-04-05 18:54   ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-04-05 19:26     ` Scott Mayhew
2019-04-05 20:11       ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-03-26 22:06 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/5] nfsd: keep a tally of RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations when using nfsdcld Scott Mayhew
2019-03-26 22:06 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/5] nfsd: re-order client tracking method selection Scott Mayhew
2019-04-05 20:40   ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-03-26 22:06 ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/5] nfsd: handle legacy client tracking records sent by nfsdcld Scott Mayhew
2019-03-28 21:17 ` [PATCH RFC v3 0/5] un-deprecate nfsdcld J. Bruce Fields
2019-03-29 12:16   ` Scott Mayhew
2019-04-05 20:43     ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190326220630.2911-1-smayhew@redhat.com \
    --to=smayhew@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox