From: Dan Aloni <dan.aloni@vastdata.com>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NFSD: trim reads past NFS_OFFSET_MAX and fix NFSv3 check
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 08:29:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220123062919.7yjz5ryousix6vxf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ADEC85C2-8D72-4E25-A49B-2039C1FF82F2@oracle.com>
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 05:37:16PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> Similar language in RFC 8881 section 18.22.4:
>
> >> If the server returns a "short read" (i.e., fewer data than requested
> >> and eof is set to FALSE), the client should send another READ to get
> >> the remaining data. A server may return less data than requested
> >> under several circumstances. The file may have been truncated by
> >> another client or perhaps on the server itself, changing the file
> >> size from what the requesting client believes to be the case. This
> >> would reduce the actual amount of data available to the client. It
> >> is possible that the server reduce the transfer size and so return a
> >> short read result. Server resource exhaustion may also occur in a
> >> short read.
>
> So the server could be returning INVAL and leaving EOF set
> to false. That might be triggering the client to retry the
> READ. Does the server need to set the EOF flag if the READ
> arguments cross the limit of the range that the server can
> return? Does the client need to check for this case and
> stop retrying? The specs aren't particularly clear on this
> matter.
But eof only in `resok` and not in `resfail`. For reference, here's the
reply I got:
Network File System, READ Reply Error: NFS3ERR_INVAL
[Program Version: 3]
[V3 Procedure: READ (6)]
Status: NFS3ERR_INVAL (22)
file_attributes Regular File mode: 0600 uid: 0 gid: 0
attributes_follow: value follows (1)
attributes Regular File mode: 0600 uid: 0 gid: 0
Type: Regular File (1)
Mode: 0600, S_IRUSR, S_IWUSR
nlink: 1
uid: 0
gid: 0
size: 9223372036854775807
used: 4096
rdev: 0,0
fsid: 0x0000000000000002 (2)
fileid: 69
atime: Jan 18, 2022 20:20:33.611267439 IST
seconds: 1642530033
nano seconds: 611267439
mtime: Jan 18, 2022 20:20:33.571266608 IST
seconds: 1642530033
nano seconds: 571266608
ctime: Jan 18, 2022 20:20:33.571266608 IST
seconds: 1642530033
nano seconds: 571266608
--
Dan Aloni
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-23 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-27 18:00 [PATCH] NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to the RPC read layers trondmy
2022-01-18 19:26 ` Dan Aloni
2022-01-18 19:33 ` [PATCH] NFS: fix an infinite request retry in an off-by-one last page read Dan Aloni
2022-01-18 19:43 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-21 18:50 ` [PATCH] NFSD: trim reads past NFS_OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni
2022-01-21 22:32 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-01-22 12:47 ` Dan Aloni
2022-01-22 17:05 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-01-22 18:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-22 20:15 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-01-22 20:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-23 17:35 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-01-22 19:01 ` Dan Aloni
2022-01-22 20:33 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-01-22 12:49 ` [PATCH v2] NFSD: trim reads past NFS_OFFSET_MAX and fix NFSv3 check Dan Aloni
2022-01-22 17:37 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-01-23 6:29 ` Dan Aloni [this message]
2022-01-23 9:50 ` [PATCH v3] " Dan Aloni
2022-01-23 15:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-23 17:03 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-01-26 16:23 ` Chuck Lever III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220123062919.7yjz5ryousix6vxf@gmail.com \
--to=dan.aloni@vastdata.com \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox