Re: [pynfs RFC PATCH] testserver.py: special-case the "all" flag

[bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 01:20:43PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The READMEs for v4.0 and v4.1 are inconsistent here. For v4.0, the "all"
> flag is supposed to run all of the "standard" tests. For v4.1 "all" is
> documented to run all of the tests, but it actually doesn't since not
> every tests has "all" in its FLAGS: field.
> 
> I move that we change this. If I say that I want to run "all", then I
> really do want to run _all_ of the tests. Ensure that every test has the
> "all" flag set.

In some (all?) cases where the "all" flag was left off, it was
intentional.

We try not to flag spec-compliant servers as failing, because people are
sometimes a little careless about "fixing" failures that in their
particular case really shouldn't be fixed.  But sometimes it's still
useful to have a test that goes somewhat beyond the spec.

There might be other ways to handle that kind of test, but it would need
some more thought.

--b.

> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
>  nfs4.1/testmod.py | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> If this is unacceptable, then an alternative could be to add a new
> (similarly special-cased) "everything" flag.
> 
> diff --git a/nfs4.1/testmod.py b/nfs4.1/testmod.py
> index 11e759d673fd..7b3bac543084 100644
> --- a/nfs4.1/testmod.py
> +++ b/nfs4.1/testmod.py
> @@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ def createtests(testdir):
>      for t in tests:
>  ##         if not t.flags_list:
>  ##             raise RuntimeError("%s has no flags" % t.fullname)
> +        if "all" not in t.flags_list:
> +            t.flags_list.append("all")
>          for f in t.flags_list:
>              if f not in flag_dict:
>                  flag_dict[f] = bit
> -- 
> 2.39.2