From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2 0/3] nfs: Improve throughput for random buffered writes
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:50:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240617073525.10666-1-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
[Resending because of messed up mailing list address]
Hello,
this is second revision of my patch series improving NFS throughput for
buffered writes.
Changes since v1:
* Added Reviewed-by tags
* Made sleep waiting for congestion to resolve killable
Original cover letter below:
I was thinking how to best address the performance regression coming from
NFS write congestion. After considering various options and concerns raised
in the previous discussion, I've got an idea for a simple option that could
help to keep the server more busy - just mimick what block devices do and
block the flush worker waiting for congestion to resolve instead of aborting
the writeback. And it actually helps enough that I don't think more complex
solutions are warranted at this point.
This patch series has two preparatory cleanups and then a patch implementing
this idea.
Honza
Previous versions:
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20240612153022.25454-1-jack@suse.cz # v1
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-01 10:50 Jan Kara [this message]
2024-07-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] nfs: Drop pointless check from nfs_commit_release_pages() Jan Kara
2024-07-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] nfs: Properly initialize server->writeback Jan Kara
2024-07-01 11:23 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-01 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] nfs: Block on write congestion Jan Kara
2024-07-17 15:58 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 0/3] nfs: Improve throughput for random buffered writes Jan Kara
2024-07-17 17:44 ` Anna Schumaker
2024-07-18 9:47 ` Jan Kara
2024-07-18 19:26 ` Anna Schumaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240617073525.10666-1-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox