public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>, Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS buffered write cleanup
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 07:35:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240705053551.GA11711@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240701052707.1246254-1-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 07:26:47AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> this series cleans up the nfs_page handling in the buffer write path.
> 
> The first patch was already sent independently but hasn't been picked up
> and this included here again.
> 
> The last patch fixes a bug where a request could get incorrectly reused.
> It would require the flexfiles layout and odd I/O timings, and without
> a flexfiles server I can't actually hit it.  I'd appreciate a careful
> review of that one.
> 
> The series is against Trond's testing branch.

Looks like Anna is doing this merge window despite the earlier testing
branch from Trond.  That already has the first patch applied, and the
rest applies fine to it as well.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-05  5:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-01  5:26 NFS buffered write cleanup Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-01  5:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] nfs: remove dead code for the old swap over NFS implementation Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02  7:37   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-01  5:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] nfs: remove nfs_folio_private_request Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02  7:38   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-01  5:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] nfs: simplify nfs_folio_find_and_lock_request Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02  7:54   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-03  4:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-01  5:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] nfs: fold nfs_folio_find_and_lock_request into nfs_lock_and_join_requests Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02  7:57   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-03  4:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-01  5:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] nfs: fold nfs_page_group_lock_subrequests " Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02  7:59   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-01  5:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] nfs: move nfs_wait_on_request to write.c Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02  7:59   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-01  5:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] nfs: don't reuse partially completed requests in nfs_lock_and_join_requests Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02  8:07   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-03  4:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-05  5:35 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240705053551.GA11711@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox