Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cel@kernel.org
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Split up refactoring of fh_verify()
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 20:44:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240828004445.22634-1-cel@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

These six patches are meant to replace:

  nfsd: factor out __fh_verify to allow NULL rqstp to be passed
  nfsd: add nfsd_file_acquire_local()

I've removed the @nfs_vers parameter to __fh_verify(), and tried
something a little different with the trace points. Please check
my math.

These have been compile-tested, but no more than that. Interested in
comments.

Chuck Lever (2):
  NFSD: Avoid using rqstp->rq_vers in nfsd_set_fh_dentry()
  NFSD: Short-circuit fh_verify tracepoints for LOCALIO

NeilBrown (4):
  NFSD: Handle @rqstp == NULL in check_nfsd_access()
  NFSD: Refactor nfsd_setuser_and_check_port()
  nfsd: factor out __fh_verify to allow NULL rqstp to be passed
  nfsd: add nfsd_file_acquire_local()

 fs/nfsd/export.c    |  29 ++++--
 fs/nfsd/filecache.c |  61 +++++++++++--
 fs/nfsd/filecache.h |   3 +
 fs/nfsd/lockd.c     |   6 +-
 fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c     | 210 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h     |   5 ++
 fs/nfsd/trace.h     |  18 ++--
 7 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)

-- 
2.45.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-08-28  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-28  0:44 cel [this message]
2024-08-28  0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] NFSD: Handle @rqstp == NULL in check_nfsd_access() cel
2024-08-28  1:12   ` NeilBrown
2024-08-28  3:00     ` Mike Snitzer
2024-08-28  6:30       ` NeilBrown
2024-08-28 13:26         ` Chuck Lever III
2024-08-28 13:45         ` Mike Snitzer
2024-08-28 21:05           ` NeilBrown
2024-08-29  0:27             ` Mike Snitzer
2024-08-28  0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] NFSD: Refactor nfsd_setuser_and_check_port() cel
2024-08-28  0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] NFSD: Avoid using rqstp->rq_vers in nfsd_set_fh_dentry() cel
2024-08-28  5:02   ` NeilBrown
2024-08-28 13:45     ` Chuck Lever
2024-08-28 14:19       ` Mike Snitzer
2024-08-28  0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] NFSD: Short-circuit fh_verify tracepoints for LOCALIO cel
2024-08-28  0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] nfsd: factor out __fh_verify to allow NULL rqstp to be passed cel
2024-08-28  0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] nfsd: add nfsd_file_acquire_local() cel
2024-08-28  1:08 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Split up refactoring of fh_verify() Mike Snitzer
2024-08-28  2:32   ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240828004445.22634-1-cel@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox