From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: cel@kernel.org
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Split up refactoring of fh_verify()
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 21:08:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zs54kI1KA407SDqQ@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240828004445.22634-1-cel@kernel.org>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 08:44:39PM -0400, cel@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>
> These six patches are meant to replace:
>
> nfsd: factor out __fh_verify to allow NULL rqstp to be passed
> nfsd: add nfsd_file_acquire_local()
>
> I've removed the @nfs_vers parameter to __fh_verify(), and tried
> something a little different with the trace points. Please check
> my math.
>
> These have been compile-tested, but no more than that. Interested in
> comments.
Reviewed quickly just now, nicely done!
I'll go over it very carefully now by replacing the 2 patches you
noted and updating the localio patches thaa follow. I noticed some
typos and mentioning nfs_vers usage in a header despite you having
removed the need to pass it. So I'll fix up those nits along the way.
But I just wanted to immediately say: thanks!
> Chuck Lever (2):
> NFSD: Avoid using rqstp->rq_vers in nfsd_set_fh_dentry()
> NFSD: Short-circuit fh_verify tracepoints for LOCALIO
>
> NeilBrown (4):
> NFSD: Handle @rqstp == NULL in check_nfsd_access()
> NFSD: Refactor nfsd_setuser_and_check_port()
> nfsd: factor out __fh_verify to allow NULL rqstp to be passed
> nfsd: add nfsd_file_acquire_local()
>
> fs/nfsd/export.c | 29 ++++--
> fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 61 +++++++++++--
> fs/nfsd/filecache.h | 3 +
> fs/nfsd/lockd.c | 6 +-
> fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c | 210 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h | 5 ++
> fs/nfsd/trace.h | 18 ++--
> 7 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-28 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-28 0:44 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Split up refactoring of fh_verify() cel
2024-08-28 0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] NFSD: Handle @rqstp == NULL in check_nfsd_access() cel
2024-08-28 1:12 ` NeilBrown
2024-08-28 3:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-08-28 6:30 ` NeilBrown
2024-08-28 13:26 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-08-28 13:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-08-28 21:05 ` NeilBrown
2024-08-29 0:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-08-28 0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] NFSD: Refactor nfsd_setuser_and_check_port() cel
2024-08-28 0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] NFSD: Avoid using rqstp->rq_vers in nfsd_set_fh_dentry() cel
2024-08-28 5:02 ` NeilBrown
2024-08-28 13:45 ` Chuck Lever
2024-08-28 14:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-08-28 0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] NFSD: Short-circuit fh_verify tracepoints for LOCALIO cel
2024-08-28 0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] nfsd: factor out __fh_verify to allow NULL rqstp to be passed cel
2024-08-28 0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] nfsd: add nfsd_file_acquire_local() cel
2024-08-28 1:08 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2024-08-28 2:32 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Split up refactoring of fh_verify() Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zs54kI1KA407SDqQ@kernel.org \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox