Re: warning in nfsd4_cb_done

[Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot <bugbot@kernel.org>]

Chuck Lever writes via Kernel.org Bugzilla:

(In reply to Chuck Lever from comment #4)
> (In reply to Bugspray Bot from comment #3)
> > Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu> replies to comment #1:
> > 
> > > First issue is the explicit use of NFS4ERR_BAD_XDR in the CB_GETATTR
> reply
> > > decoder. Should be EIO instead.
> > >
> > > Second issue is the CB_GETATTR reply decoder does not seem capable of
> > > handling a non-zero status code in the reply.
> > >
> > > Third issue is whether NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE means the server requested a
> > > CB_GETATTR for the wrong file, or if it is an expected situation.
> > 
> > Isn't this because 6.12.x is still missing the patch "NFSD: fix
> > decoding in nfs4_xdr_dec_cb_getattr" that just went into 6.14?
> 
> Yes, second and third issues are addressed by 1b3e26a5ccbf ("NFSD: fix
> decoding in nfs4_xdr_dec_cb_getattr").

I take it back: The third issue is not addressed by 1b3e26a5ccbf. Why is the server sending the client a delegation that it rejects? And does the server recover properly in this case?

But again, 1b3e26a5ccbf should prevent the warning reported here.

View: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219737#c6
You can reply to this message to join the discussion.
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
Kernel.org Bugzilla (bugspray 0.1-dev)